>crypto bad
kek
Like anyone that talks about something they've put in no effort to understand, you absolute brainlet poorfags need to just keep this idiocy to yourselves.
This is a place for people who do research.
Give it a try.
He's easily compromised. He has skin in the game and it's very clear.
Don't forget - you're watching a movie.
Any time something like this is allowed to pass by vision of the proles, it has to have some embedded truth.
The only people that you can even aim at with this rhetoric, where things are "Satanic", like that isn't meaningless drivel at this point, are the normies and newfags obsessed with Abrahamic religions.
Everyone else understands the ambiguity of "Satan". Q themselves even question these moronic tropes you employ.
Retarded and gullible celebrities might think they're in some "Satanic club" for brainlets, but the ones higher up understand how vague that term is and anyone that's done adequate research to understand what group's word that is and what it means knows that you're just some incompetent moran that says too much while knowing too little.
You don't think some of the glows (precursors to glows, I suppose) maybe… I dunno… adopted some Nazis and then ran the CIA for a while, do you?
Here's a hint:
Whenever you see, "satanic gibberish" here, you filter ID+.
You should do the same for any kind of nudity, calls for more nudity to be posted or any variation of "thanking" the baker.
Another good filter criteria is using the name or subject fields or using anything other than "Anonymous".
These few things alone will make breads way more tolerable.
Who is Catherine Austin-Fitts?
What did she uncover?
Why was she punished?
Oh, anon… we're the aliens.
Well, Red and Black… but yeah, I'm noticing the same.
Well, obviously we shouldn't agree with everything each other is saying, anon… then we'd just be Facebook, Reddit or Twitter all over again.
The guy is annoying, though. I'll agree with you on that for sure.
Okay, retard.
You seem awfully sensitive over these topics… I wonder what you could possibly stand to gain by degrading my post.
Judging by that person not having let go of their attachments to their current worldview yet, putting stock in to anything that's being said isn't worth your time.
I wouldn't bother getting worked up over what that "anon" is saying. They're clearly new here. We had long digs on Mythology and have discussed for years all of the different angles and shit to each iteration of the cosmic stories. Anyone that ran in to our threads and shrieked "satanic gibberish!" anytime we discussed anything outside of the overton window of Christians or general biblefags would have gotten laughed out of there.
Do not invest any emotions in the retards that don't do research here. They're super easy to spot if you do beginners digs on most topics before chiming in.
First there was darkness, then the (now atrophied) big guy threw some light in there.
Creator watched from beyond and jumped in when Creator felt like it to spice things up for itself and to enjoy the fabrication the (sometimes) asshole threw together.
This thought dichotomy we've been thrust in to by the ones that don't want people to understand things or be able to think for themselves has only ever been poisonous.
What we should be seeking is Harmony. This truly is an illusion.
>most people that come here aren't newfags
By god, you're either way too optimistic or completely deluded.
Take a look at the other posts that (You)'d me on that one, anon. You might get a chuckle out of it.
They're a bit obvious.