>>13900220

curious, isn't it. those people who now get instabannded in BV bann hammer is in the chair used to run rough shod over everyone here, bullying all the anon, announcing that thye were the crew that ran the place, staging 'bravado' and 'daring do' as conflict scripts, being jerks to everyone, and flooding the board with operational nonsense designed by inhouse agency hacks and their paid-for enablers.

so I found it curious when suddenly some time in the Spring the BV showed up and was seemingly going on with a rather horrid banter, expressing political views, and doing battle with some of the roboposters.

there was a new kind of flood that showed up sometime in March, (if my memory is correct) which was a script that created a container full of images that were all the same image, to start, but modified to have random and unique aspect ratios and sizes (within a range) and messaging to those posts was about Jim and Ron.

the idea was that iwas supposed to be Fred (the wheel chair guy, who is a villain in the script)

Part one, "the body was too long" so said the script.

paarrttt too

villain in script and in real life too?

what what is real and what is conflict script.

it was not clear.

I used to talk about it the only way that is possible by saying 'we don't really know but here is how it seems to be, as I'm copious with the keystrokes (my fingers like to move) in the mornings, my mind gets 'on' before the coffee kicks in to say 'really? posting this again'.

so I tried to craft a mystery-science-theater (a real show) quality (or lack of quality?) side-banter of me shill splaining about what it seems to be.

in my narrations (which would morph from day to day, cause they were not just copy pasta) I didn't edit to a second draft (this is the kun) and I'd talk about it and try to understand it.

basic point: it often times seemed to be just a script.

but clearly BV are real pepole.

and the 'characters' in the nonsense script, while they seem to be played by individuals, perhaps represent (there is that word, 'perhaps', me admitting that I rift it off the cuff and only partly filter it as I make it up , but it is still useful)

the individuals in the play perhaps represent agency groups who 'work the board', know of each other, and loosely were allied. But like partisans often are rivals, these ones don't have friendship behavior. And on a particular day (a Saturday) the news was hot with a country that hatered towards it gets flooded into this board (all discussion of it is always muted for that reason, you'all know who )

and then a building was blown up

in Gaza.

at that point the behavior of the BV was . . . heated. Swiftly he started being bitch BV the partisan.

I looked at it like anger in action.

one team was now at war with the other.

events played out over the last month that do suggest that credentials to 'run' the board exist with many different people (or teams). Jimmy W (Jimmy?) said in a pod cast that . . .

he reduced the Global Volunteers to 11 (there were more than that, find and watch him, he's got a winsome way about him)

part three

any hoo . . .

the battle between these agency board overlords is a bit troubling because of the spurging of fowl and hateful operational memes that are designed to poison behavior. Or the constant flaunting of hypnotized bait girls, or pretty girls who shared with their beau and beau shouldn't have let the photo out of his phone . . .

all in all very disrespectful to these pretty women, and I, for one, was always accused about being . . . well not for women.

in fact it's because I know that these women are real that it pisses me off that I'm shown the front-sides which should be for their loving friend : a husband. And that if they were asked to approve all uses of their image, that they probably would say "do not post me on that site" about this place and tell the person who wants to that the person isn't paying their fees to use those images, and that she's 'moved on' and 'doesn't model like that anymore'.

or is she wants to then he pays the license to show her beauty and have his effect . . . and everyone is happy.

anyway so ya, all that banning is to people who are known operators in that realm of agency puppet persona (or is he?) quality posters.

I call them 'flavored posters'

they call out acronym names as if it's an episode of Happy Daze.

they have no problem bringing the conversation to 'mean shill' mode immediately.

and they mock everyone and everything and try to humiliate others.

however the banning is because the BV knows who they are an these people were banned (that is the narrative that works for me, but is it really a correct one?)

yes BV uses nouns that have been prohibited from use in certain circles. I watched the Life of Brian recently on a DVD and it had a part where the Brian says "I 'm a . . … .and a . . . . " etc leaping around with his mum because he justd found out his dad was a Roman. And it was a funny use fo words, that now, if you use them people try to end your career, if not your life.

So I understand how BV perhaps feels that the tyranny of word-banning is worse than the worry about the 'power' of the current crew of smart-heads who pretend to run the world, but seem to be puppets or at least programmed creatures who . . . don't get that the world won't put up with their bullying and we are free to say words, that, even now, I'm not going to input them here (the K word, the Y word).

the point is: no word is allowed to use a name for that group because . . . they don't want (they not all of them but the smartheads who bobble for the real power) to have that group be discussed by anyone.

worse prohibitions exist about other topics, but because the prohibitions are enfored rather randomly and irratinally (with beheadings) people also leave that topic alone.

grudge fued murder due to the slip of using a word is rather a harsh sentence.

but that's the real world.

with in the narrative of this place we have this BV, now, a real person. We seem to know this BV's name (he also says 'say my name') but I'm never sure.

so I don't say it.

and there are bans of IP hopping clod-posters who'se main point is to harrass the BV while he is on his shift.

the posts are about the fact that BV bans them.

the IPs are (supposed to be) known by BV so he supposedly really knows it's not Joe from Ranch Nuevo on his wireless during the morning coffee time. or Karen from Shore-bay heights at the crest during her walk time, when she pecks at the touch screen.

It's some acrynym or rodent-name put down and he's . . . in his mums basement

so that's the narrative.

and it's really going on in the breads.

fin

wow see how much copy I can churn out before I even finish my first cup of morning coffee . . .

Breakfast Blend

>>13900395

maybe next he can do that Abortion clinc near Market in Philly

8 years ago, during this time of year, in Los Angeles (LA) . . .

is said to have died in a fiery crash

but did he really?

>>13900440

you're sliding . . .

>>13900450

>>13900450

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXQh9jTwwoA

Le Mer

>>13900478