>>13900222

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/06/13/new-york-times-reports-andrew-weissmann-and-robert-mueller-sought-then-hid-special-counsel-surveillance-of-trump-white-house-attorney-don-mcghan/

New York Times Reports Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller Sought, Then Hid, Special Counsel Surveillance of Trump White House Attorney Don McGhan

June 13, 2021 | sundance | 229 Comments

My headline is what happened, the New York Times headline is massive spin: “Apple Is Said to Have Turned Over Data on Trump’s White House Counsel in 2018”.

Notice what the New York Times is doing here. Everything about their article is written to hide, obfuscate and ignore the reality of what their article actually is revealing. Look closely:

>>13900237

February 2018 was at the time when the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel was at it’s apex. In early February the corrupt special counsel found out about the FBI leak investigation into the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) that surrounded James Wolfe and Senator Mark Warner.

The leak investigation was run out of the Washington Field Office by Brian Dugan. The special counsel was unaware until the case against Wolfe was complete.

What the special counsel was doing in February 2018 was: (1) covering the tracks of the Obama-era political surveillance; (2) trying to retain their own investigative credibility by hiding prior abuses by the DOJ and FBI during that surveillance; (3) continue surveillance of the Trump administration under the auspices of a “Trump-Russia Collusion/Conspiracy” investigation; and (3) build a fraudulent obstruction case against President Trump in order to remove him from office.

As Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein noted in his April 2020 testimony to congress, Rosenstein was facilitating all the requests made by the special counsel. Rosenstein did not question any of the expanded scope requests from Weissmann/Mueller, and Rosenstein did not deny an requests for investigative tools or techniques that required his signature. In short, Rosenstein gave the special counsel every authority they requested without any pushback. When Rosenstein was questioned about this he said he didn’t feel it was appropriate to challenge the special counsel as it could be perceived as him interfering with their “investigative techniques” and “authorities.”

So what this New York Times article is really highlighting is how the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel went after the personal records of White House Attorney Don McGhan and his family. DOJ Attorney Andrew Weissmann was digging for information that could be used against the Trump White House. THAT is where the subpoenas came from.

It is possible the New York Times is trying to get out in front of the issue with this article. Keep in mind the primary PR firm of the FBI is the New York Times. When the FBI needs cover, they shape their side of events to the New York Times via “people familiar with the matter” etc.

Perhaps Durham is close to reporting on the motives and operations of the Special Counsel, who knows? But there’s a reason why the New York Times is trying to cloud the background of what this surveillance of the Trump White House counsel is all about.

>>13900241

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1404220958416637952

@shipwreckedcrew

''This is pure unadulterated horseshit nonsense from the NYT. ''

@nytmike

'' how can you and Savage write this story without mentioning ONE TIME that in Feb. 2018 McGhan was under scrutiny of the Mueller SCO who were at that point focused on "obstruction?''

>>13900267

https://twitter.com/FakeLeftSucks/status/1404243161971572741

Replying to

@shipwreckedcrew

Durham knows everything so this could be cover for the coming storm.

Replying to

@shipwreckedcrew

McGahn was to be their key witness on what instructions Trump had given about firing Comey and shutting down the Russian Hoax investigation, or obstructing the SCO investigation.

This "Justice Department subpoena" was 99.99% a subpoena from Mueller/Weissman.

7:35 PM · Jun 13, 2021·Twitter Web App

It is odd that Barr, Rosenstein & Sessions confidently say it wasn't them.

Kikemann@AWeissmann_

In all the deserved hubbub about the Apple legal process for McGahn and Democrats, remember that Barr and Rosenstein’s recent comments are not denials. They claim to merely not recall briefings, which reeks of obfuscation. And who would forget going after such records?

6:45 PM · Jun 13, 2021·Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1404220960165695488

>>13900244

14 JUNE

14 June

Q !CbboFOtcZs No.109 📁

Jun 14 2018 12:28:13 (EST)

321RR.jpg⬇

[[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.

What evidence to support?

Snowball.

[[RR]] @ WH.

Why was Rachel Brand removed?

Critical thinking.

Q

Brave 11-Year-Old Girl Kicked Out of School for Refusing to Continue Wearing a Mask

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/brave-11-year-old-girl-kicked-school-refusing-continue-wearing-mask/

A brave and outspoken 11-year-old girl says that she has been kicked out of school after she refused to continue wearing a mask in her hot classroom — declaring the requirement to be child abuse.

Jenna Miller is a student at Cahill Elementary School in New York and passionate BMX rider.

On Wednesday, Miller posted on Instagram blasting her school district for forcing children to “muzzle” themselves in classrooms that can reach temperatures around 90 degrees.

“Today was a hard emotional day for me. Today I stood my ground and I was very adamant to standing up for what’s right and making it known it’s not a safe environment no longer being in a hot classroom with no Air conditioning with temperatures yesterday of 96° and today was a high of 86° masked and slaved to concentrate and do work at our desks with sweat pouring off of me,” Miller captioned a photo of herself leaving the school.

“I love the heat I know what it’s like to be in the heat I race Bmx year around in full uniform the only difference is I come off the track soaking wet I’m able to drink freely, I’m able to breathe in the fresh air without a muzzle to my face this is inhumane,” she continued. Tagging her school district, she continued on to say that “@saugertiescsd refuses to unmask us. @saugertiescsd refuses to ease the guidelines that we have to wear our mask during gym class and outside in excess of temperatures.”

Miller went on to compare the requirement to leaving a dog in a hot car. She also pointed out the hypocrisy of school officials not having to wear them all day.

“Today’s the day I said to myself I don’t no if I’m going to make it through the entire school day because of the Constant pressure from the teachers yelling at me to muzzle myself. Today was the day I said no. I was kicked out of school because I was not being compliant with mask orders in a poorly ventilated classroom. This is the true definition of child abuse in my eyes. You don’t leave a dog in the car 🚗 you certainly don’t control us kids being in a hot classroom with a mask over our face,” she wrote. “All of the administrators get to sit and bark orders from their air-conditioned offices in business suits on not masked. I don’t know what statement they are trying to make for us. Today was the day I said no more. I hope this picture goes viral and to just know your in control of your body The board of education is not. #unmaskamerica #unmaskkids”

>>13900403

>Miller went on to compare the requirement to leaving a dog in a hot car. She also pointed out the hypocrisy of school officials not having to wear them all day.

14 JUNE 1775 - ARMY BIRTHDAY and INFANTRY BRANCH BIRTHDAY - #RevolutionaryWar

America's Revolutionary War had begun with the Battles of Lexington and Concord on 19 April 1775, but for the time being, it represented mainly a regional New England rebellion and was not yet viewed as a War for American independence.

On 14 June, the Continental Congress took a step closer to making the conflict a national fight when it ''“Resolved. That six companies of expert rifflemen (sic), be immediately raised in Pennsylvania, two in Maryland, and two in Virginia … [and] as soon as compleated [sic], shall march and join the army near Boston, to be there employed as light infantry, under the command of the chief Officer in that army." ''

This action is considered the beginning of the U.S. Army.

The Congress also adopted the New England Army of Observation, and by resolving to raise the ten companies of riflemen from the Middle Colonies, made it a "Continental Army" that would eventually represent all thirteen colonies. The next task before the delegates was to select a commander in chief. George Washington of Virginia became the favored choice.

Congress prescribed the following oath of enlistment:

"I have, this day, voluntarily enlisted myself, as a soldier, in the American continental army, for one year, unless sooner discharged: And I do bind myself to conform, in all instances, to such rules and regulations, as are, or shall be, established for the government of the said. Army."

The resolution to raise the ten companies of riflemen is also recognized as the birthday of the U.S. Army's Infantry branch.

IMAGE: "Nation Makers," a representation of the Continental Army at the 11 September 1777 Battle of Brandywine, depicts the determination of the American Soldier and the Continental Army.

By Howard Pyle (1853-1911), The Nation Makers, ca. 1903, oil on canvas, 40 1/4 × 26". Brandywine River Museum

of Art, Purchased through a grant from the Mabel Pew Myrin Trust, 1984. Used with permission.