The question isn't whether or not Trump is President.
The question is - if the states decide to decertify their elections after finding fraud - what will the Supreme Court decide?
Remember the decision rendered in regard to the native american tribes in Oklahoma? It doesn't matter how inconvenient it is now, if the law was not followed then it is nullified.
I suppose we could technically say that Pelosi is supposed to be President right now, but there's a firewall in the way.
Who do they talk to, anon?
The media?
Maybe one of them is saavy enough to come here and make a drop and risk revealing who they are. We get a minimally sauced claim.
Many people just put on the blinders, go do their job, and try to avoid rocking the boat and/or being rocked by the boat.
The problem is that no person with a constructive plan wants violence. Violence is simply an unavoidable measure that will be necessary to achieve stages of their plan.
My plans are all generally coming together and it would seem that violence will be able to be kept to a minumum. Battles are fought when two forces try to win at the same thing in the same place and at the same time. Proper strategic planning allows for the campaign victory with nearly no battles, as all objectives are secured and the opponent is no longer able to continue their own campaign.
One of the simplest faults in our opponents is that they are old and failed to pass along their ideals and mechanisms to children/successive generations. If you look at who is railroading fascist asshattery through the government - it is the pinko boomers from the 60s who have turned every congressional assembly into Tales From The Crypt and have suddenly gotten a tyranny boner because a few things seemingly went their way.
It's their same little group of cronies running election halls all over the country.
Simple age will completely devastate their little bolshevik mutiny.
Cuddling up to activist groups who are filled with angst and hatred of the current status quo (and the people presiding over it) is, also, a favorable strategic blunder. Urban areas are resources for the boomer bolshevism to use as vote farms. The more those areas burn and people flee them - the better. Antifa will do gods work whether they realize it or not. Sometimes, the lessons are those of hard knocks.
So, while antifa is a bad thing for a civilized society - they are a good example and reminder of why we have legal institutions in the first place - because getting dragged out of your house and beaten to death in front of your family inferno kind of sucks as a form of due process.
When the police protect them, because paycheck, it also exemplifies the problems of human institutions and why it is we need to properly structure them and maintain them so as to be properly aligned for the function of civilization. Because a population that loses their shit and starts killing the people burning down their homes will not accept that they committed murder warranting a criminal charge from the legal system.
There is a Taoist concept - WeiWuWei… It is acting without action - or perhaps the better translation is effortless action. The taoist ideal is to achieve great things without having to endeavor against the forces of nature and society. If you don't need to swim against the current, ride with it if you can. Let what will happen naturally guide your efforts so that just a few simple motions can change the course of destiny for nations.
Well… Technically speaking the peak idea within taoism is that of achieving divine insight - which is the essence of true creation. How to do this is a rather deep topic of discussion and debate - but the idea is that everyone is living in the world. Assuming I could create food out of thin air - that isn't "true creation" as I am addressing, first, a need of the world. I am reacting to the world. The concept of divine insight is to achieve a brief moment where one can truly act upon the world without it being a reaction. Almost anything we could talk about would be a reaction to the world. Desiring to act to remove anguish would be a desire tainted by worldly interests. A true flash of divine insight is not of this world. And it is often described as a brief flash - it's not a state that can be held or maintained. A man may work his entire life to achieve just one such moment - which is just the glimpse of a concept - before being right back where he began.
…. I'm not sure I was really going anywhere with that - I just like that aspect of Taoism… That one does not become some permanently enlightened being - you just bounce off of divinity and have to piece together what it means in your monkey brain.