>>13914347

Your best offering is Solipsistic Cynicism.

Your assertions that the only way out is through one's self and only one's self can be saved is bullshit.

(You) might be the only one here, but everyone else (well… mostly everyone else) is also (You).

You were tricked. You don't really get to leave without the rest of (You).

Sprinkling in this "I'm totally an every day 'Christian'" bullshit is just a ruse.

You do nothing to help here other than foment arguments. You claim to hold Fire, but you keep it to yourself, just like [they] do. There may not really be sides, but if there were, would you really be on /our/ side?

Maybe buy a mirror or something.

>>13914358

You may be ruthlessly obnoxious, but yes, I have to agree on this.

>>13914397

Hmm do those colors actually match? The pattern does look similar to me as well.

>>13914483

That's fine.

Good luck spotting me.

>>13914487

>larping as an arbiter

top kek

Not having complete control over things is perfectly fine with me. Such is the nature of Pronoia, I suppose.

>>13914553

>>13914585

>>13914551

It looks more and more like much fewer are "fully awake" than any of us could have hoped.

>>13914606

She has a bitchute channel. Check it out.

She seems kinda nutty, but what she's explaining lines up with a lot of other things we're seeing, maybe to the point where discarding the weird shit she says is worth it.

>>13914607

I believe it's the Buddhists that practice suffering on purpose.

While most people today don't really understand what it means to be Christian, largely due to forced deviation from real teachings of the one we call Jesus, our society has long been absorbed with egregious comfort, much like "Jesus" insisted upon.

It's unfortunate that so many today still think suffering is a bad thing.

>>13914607

>>13914624

Aw damn. I meant to state that Jesus insisted we not be comfortable.

In short, I meant to point out that this is exactly the aim of "Jesus" - to suffer.

The Buddhists had intimate understanding of this, going so far as to posit that the point of existence is particularly to suffer.

>>13914641

Well, I'd be a hypocrite if I wouldn't applaud you for not just building tension. So, well done, anon. I'm glad you aren't only in a bad mood today.

But I still think we have a way to go before we peel back the yin and yang of Saklas, Abraxas, Saturn, whatever you want to call it.

Father (Time) is an asshole, indeed, the first one in fact.

Wouldn't it make more sense to reframe the "words have meaning" Rofsy angle with terms like "Satanism" and shit first?

Maybe our main contention is working at the same goal at different stages. For the record, I really am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and it is nice to see you not being as asocial tonight.

>>13914671

This obsession some of you have with sauce isn't as healthy as you want it to be. At a certain point, you just have to build up your compass for Truth.

What data would you even imagine her presenting, specifically? You aren't aware of continuity planning for corporations?…

>>13914686

kek

Like that's even an option at this point.

>>13914706

Well, it's unfortunate we can't just enjoy ourselves here.

Here I thought you were going to give up on this larp…

Either way, I hope you have a better night, anon.

Take care.

>>13914744

>q still mia

kek

You think they're missing or something? Not quite.

>>13914764

>>13914797

I don't see a good reason to doubt that most big orgs or agencies are here, DARPA especially, considering how deep they are in just about anything that might need controlling in some measure.

>>13914807

>I think he reads the board on occasion from some of his vids made and comments said. No coincidences.

I hate to break it to you, anon, but it's the exact opposite.

Trust me.

>>13914887

Nah. We're certifiably here in order to suffer.

The only way to get here is to fall.

>>13914918

Cain wasn't a Serpent.

Cain was just an asshole that ate his brother to "claim his power".

>>13914926

Maybe a world serpent…

But the "forbidden fruit" was just knowledge given by Enki or the one we today would call "Lucifer" (but he had another name before it was changed) to Eve: learning "good" from "evil" meant understanding what Anu actually did when it impregnated Eve. "Forbidden fruit" meant knowing what Eve wasn't supposed to know, hence Anu getting pissed and causing the feud between he and Enki (also Enlil/Yahweh, I guess).

The Serpent that convinced Eve to eat the Fruit wasn't Yaldaoath, though. It was actually a being that the Demiurge or Anu resented. In fact, the Serpent should be equated with Sophia/Barbelo, which inspired the birth of Seth, who this time was actually fathered by Adam… which is also a metaphor for Enki doing a more purposeful and delicate "seeding" (fucking monkeys or the workers they made and brought here).

>>13914968

Here ya go.

>>13914971

>dont know what that means

You aren't supposed to. This ambiguity it uses is meant to hold frame in order to maintain the teacher and student paradigm. Without this invented system, there would be too much room for questions, which would compromise the fabricated aura of authority.

>>13914977

The stone is key.

What kind of stone, though?

Is it actually a stone, or is it something else?

Is there an extra letter in there that isn't needed to fully communicate the message?

>>13914983

Of course it's a metaphor, anon…

It's all layered, but that doesn't mean there isn't actual history laid in there too.

Enki and Enlil, Cain and Able, Sol and Saturn, etc.

There are only so many stories.

>>13914987

>no reason to speak in riddles

So, did you just miss the whole Q drop thing for three years or something?…

These "riddles" are meant to reward those who put in the effort and filter out those that don't deserve Knowledge.

But I'd be a hypocrite if I shamed someone else for not teaching you and then also doing the same.

A tone maybe?

>>13915003

Well, first off, it's been much longer than 4,000 years and it was others before the Hindus.

But are you sure you don't mean Sun, not Son?

>I find this stuff boring.

Can't say I disagree, but what are we going to do, keep it to ourselves?

Personally, I like the idea of challenging my beliefs. It's unfortunate people only try to challenge you after you provoke them. At least it makes it easier to filter out the ones that don't deserve your attention, I guess.

>>13915020

>I must assume the latter.

I won't stop you from making prohibitive assumptions.

>God through Adam fathered Abel, but the serpent fathered Cain.

The "God" of the Garden was Anu. Creator isn't synonymous with Anu or Saklas or whatever you want to call it.

Adam and Eve simply had Abel first, Saklas stepped in and gave way to Cain and then after he ate Abel, Sophia inspired Seth through Adam.

If you want to boil down the metaphor though, it looks like this:

Adam and Eve were either native monkeys or some of the worker drones the "Gods" created. When Anu pulled a Zeus and fucked a mortal (non-god), they begot Cain. Cain ate Abel because the hybrids grew decadent. Enki got all pissed and intervened, creating new hybrids that were less shitty, to whom was taught Writing, Agriculture, some Sciences and some other neat stuff.

Isn't this fun?

>>13915080

Well, he established the colony at least. Maybe for the sake of the metaphor, we could say Enlil/Yahweh.

>>13915087

You would like aei and its pouty, tranny, nihilistic theories.