>>13915765 (pb)
language evolves, you should try it out sometime.
I actually do make my own sentences. and sometimes I even fuss over them.
Sometimes I write them down. Sometimes I type them out. Sometimes I merely think them in my head. But I am the one who makes them. How I share them might be what your were trying to pass off yourself as being an expert, when, in fact what you seem to do is just a common badgering.
to tell people to mind their business and not try to 'sum up' and say there are 'goal posts'
to call out shills and say 'you're a shill'
do you hear me?
'goal post'
get a clue: fishing for consensus is a fraudulent activity here.
do your assignment and stop asking others to write your copy for you.
'pathetic dodge of a question'
the way I see it you are trying to dodge my response, because it's not an 'answer' to a question that has no answer.
there is no coordinated effort here as you delude, or 'long term goals'.
you'd know that if you were really a long time lurker who has 'been away'.
how did I dodge it? I was direct: you are fishing for answers to make a false consensus in a venue that doesn't provide what you are looking for.
there is nothing that you suggest. your idea that there is unity of purpose in the way you farm it is false. there are not 'group activities' we don't have a 'free beer day' we aren't here coordinating and meeting up and planning in the way you suggest.
the manner of your question, without it even being answer, is, itself, an effort to defame the anon.
THINK FOR YOURSELF
stop making attempts to smeer and create a false consensus.
that's my 'response'.
if you don't like it then that is you being the svengalli creep that you seem to be.
and so it reveals what it is really doing: a leafie quality deal.
but leavie was at least kind about it.
you are rediculous, whoever you are.
pepole are pepole adn they have individual reasons for being here.
and not everyone who is here bought all the malarky that your type sells.
you have no honesty, and you are only here to defame the anon, and this board.
you should move along now.
it further reveals itself as uninterested in the future of the board, or the well being of the world and the anon and goes into a spurge about me.
I know I' have my issues, I try to improve myself everyday.
the point: this person was not an authentic anon. It is someone who is trying to waste time and cause discord.
do yourself instead with this kind an analysis and leave me out it.
tagged you by accident: PS it is their right to watch the board and you should expect that they will and do, and have, and will keep doing it.
ah, the fake quoter who uses the wrong kind of text as if it's a quotation, and in fact it's just them trying to maintain relevance as if the transaction went their way, when it didn't.
you have an "I'm OK, you're not OK" point of view before you even interact with a person.
and thats not OK in my estimation.
so I see you as 'not OK' and I'm OK with that.
and you should move along, and find someone else to try to intellectually groap
obviously us countering the 'I'm trying to get my merit badge and they said I had to try to understand nazis and I heard they come to this chat room' quality query from a Leafie pretender badger shill is NOT notable.