>>13916311
>there is no coordinated effort here as you delude, or 'long term goals'.
I didn't say either of those things, but you are a midwit and imagine whatever you like to power your strawman response
>you'd know that if you were really a long time lurker who has 'been away'.
I do know that, which is why I didn't say it in the first place.
>you are fishing for answers to make a false consensus in a venue that doesn't provide what you are looking for
No, I'm not. I asked a group of individuals a question seeking individual answers.
>there is nothing that you suggest. your idea that there is unity of purpose in the way you farm it is false. there are not 'group activities' we don't have a 'free beer day' we aren't here coordinating and meeting up and planning in the way you suggest.
>the manner of your question, without it even being answer, is, itself, an effort to defame the anon.
Again with this strawman tangent
>THINK FOR YOURSELF
>stop making attempts to smeer and create a false consensus.
More non-sequitur strawman shit
>that's my 'response'.
exactly as you'd expect from a scatter brained emotional midwit