>>13916095

Hey anons long time oldfag who completely has checked out on all this bullshit and have lost touch the day to day of this place.

I'm genuinely curious, serious informative replies appreciated:

What is the latest goalpost?

For those who are still desperately holding on to faith in Q/Trump, what is the narrative?

Do you just hyperventilate over the news and read in to meaningless headlines daily?

Or is there some larger framework of predictions for the future that you focus on, like Q will come true on the original dates later this year?

>>13916259

>I didn't fish for consensus, I asked an open question

Your pathetic dodge of the question shows you're either an emotional follower too stupid to actually follow whatever analysis is going on, or you've deluded yourself into thinking things are so complicated they can't be "summed up" and therefore you never need to confront your own beliefs to see if they are logically consistent

>>13916252

So far we have 1 anon capable of stating an honest answer to an extremely simple question that anyone spending any time here should have a crystal clear opinion on

>>13916259

>>13916261

>>13916264

>>13916295

>>13916300

>>13916319

And the rest

Honestly this is about the ration of real anons with a brain to midwits that I remember

Good to see nothing has changed

>>13916311

>there is no coordinated effort here as you delude, or 'long term goals'.

I didn't say either of those things, but you are a midwit and imagine whatever you like to power your strawman response

>you'd know that if you were really a long time lurker who has 'been away'.

I do know that, which is why I didn't say it in the first place.

>you are fishing for answers to make a false consensus in a venue that doesn't provide what you are looking for

No, I'm not. I asked a group of individuals a question seeking individual answers.

>there is nothing that you suggest. your idea that there is unity of purpose in the way you farm it is false. there are not 'group activities' we don't have a 'free beer day' we aren't here coordinating and meeting up and planning in the way you suggest.

>the manner of your question, without it even being answer, is, itself, an effort to defame the anon.

Again with this strawman tangent

>THINK FOR YOURSELF

>stop making attempts to smeer and create a false consensus.

More non-sequitur strawman shit

>that's my 'response'.

exactly as you'd expect from a scatter brained emotional midwit

>>13916351

>everyone who doesn't perfectly mirror my speech patterns, opinions, and behavior, is CNN

top tier