>>13916339
>Honestly this is about the ration of real anons with a brain to midwits that I remember
>Good to see nothing has changed
If you've followed long enough you'd realize the anon's here couldn't research,
in fact not even recognize a pimple for what it is on their faggot boyfriends backside.
the ability they do have is to plagiarize the work of anons on other platforms,
from codemonkeyZ on telegraph, tucker on fox, Lindel, Flynn, infowars, gatewaypundit…
so the discussions are useless except as comic relief (even shills aside)
but the notables are worth a scan (as mentioned
being 99.99% other peoples work.)