Anonymous ID: 51248c June 16, 2021, 9:02 p.m. No.13921385   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Illusion of Evidence-based Medicine

from March 2021, but highly relevant because explains how studies on HCQ, etc, could have been so wrong

Leemon McHenry PhD

41 minutes

https://youtu.be/UAEAWyfuEWY

 

How did medical journals like Lancet go so far wrong on HCQ (etc)?

This video clarifies how this probably happening.

Via medical ghostwriting

 

Medical ghostwriting - Big pharma is manufacturing medical article behind the scenes for marketing purposes. Medical journals are not what they seem. Peer review is not trustworthy.

 

What is medical ghostwriting?

 

Worst-case scenario - pharma does a trial, someone writes the manuscript for the trial, pharma pays the med communication co to approve draft of the manuscript; then marketers approve the manuscript. Then they find suitable authors - honorary. Academics at research centers are paid to put their names on the papers. THIS IS FRAUD.

 

Medical journals have evolved into medical "laundering" operation. 'Dirty' (ghost written) manuscripts are converted to 'clean' manuscripts. ONLY THEY ARE NOT.

 

Opinion leaders - Their names end up as the first author on journal articles.

writer - the one who drafted the manuscript (name is eventually dropped)

author - the one who gets credit

 

Many of the journals have become dependent on Big Pharma money. - They also buy many copies of these journals. So they are conflicted. As a result, they publish a mix of articles. Some of the articles are real, some are fraudulent - but the latter are so well written it's almost impossible to tell the difference now.

 

Medical journal editors and ghostwriters go to the same conferences. Symbiotic relationship.

 

VIOXX scandal - problems were known re strokes/heart attacks during the trials. One of the ghostwritten manuscripts downplayed heart attack dangers. One of the lead authors said "i went with the data that Merck gave me."

 

Adverse events - Ghostwriting helps hide them. You can describe the adverse events in different ways - depending on its CODING, it can be 'hidden'. In one study, they coded suicidal events as 'emotional ability'.

 

Other ways to manipulate a study -

  1. study design

  2. conduct of the trial (typically outsourced)

  3. reporting of the trial

You can have cheating at every stage.

 

Last 20-30 years - the risk/benefit ratio is not in favor of the drug.

Big Pharma uses a combo of fear and our trust in pharma to promote drug use.

 

Role of FDA - industry becomes a client to the regulators - thus no rigorous regulating - and the problem of the revolving door.

 

COVID 19 "vaxxes" - rushed to market fast

There's every reason to be skeptical. "Is what we've got marketing or science?"

What kind of trust are willing to put in this?

 

How do we get back to evidence based medicine?

 

Solution: Don't let mfrs do their own testing

Anonymous ID: 51248c June 16, 2021, 9:07 p.m. No.13921404   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1413 >>1414 >>1425 >>1428

>>13921382

Anons are open to discussions about sauce-based discussions of Israel or the involvement of Jews like the Rothschilds (etc) in DS. Simply calling people names (kikes etc) isn't a discussion - it's an insult that makes Q movement look like enemies of the Jewish people and/or religion. Q never said anything negative about either - so why should anons do so on a board called "QResearch"?

 

The only reason would be to make the board look bad. That is not what we want - not most of us.