>>13922679

Just setting Russia up as the scapegoat if any of those are attacked.

If an American company is attacked it will be ruled as an attack on a NATO country and engulf Europe in the war.

Schwab just laying out the scenario for the sheeple so they'll swallow the bait when the war drums against Russia beat.

We all kind of knew this was coming, so not out of the realm of possibility, IMO.

Still say that Putin's Trump card is Trump. If he knows stuff about the election and Jan 6 that can take out the group hiding behind Bidan, it may be a game winner.

>>13923273

I think this one gets filed under useful idiot.

She got talked into doing it, and was told she was clever enough to pull it off. Any hired help she recruited are expendable as well. Besides, the GA legal system had her six. What could go wrong?

She's just there as a fail-safe for the suits, IMO, because she's probably not smart enough to keep all bases covered. Might be the suits are executing the preliminary contingency plans to secure the retreat.

I don't think Abrams is likable, and, yeah, there will be "racist', white supremacist cards played, but the writing seems to be on the wall. Not a sympathetic person.

>>13923373

NATO is fucked, because if Bidan declares a cyber attack an act of war by Russia, the European block has to respond.

Schwab said an attack was coming, count on it, and Bidan warned Russia not to do it. Connect the dots.

So, agree, NATO would never risk such a scenario.

Wasn't the PC Bidan was 3 hrs. late for after the NATO meet up, same day Zelensky allegedly said Ukraine was in NATO?

Yeah, Bidan was just he messenger telling NATO what they were going to do. Message was from Schwab/WEF.

>>13923446

Yup. Agree.

Child's play now to take out an economy. No EU country can withstand that threat.

We're going to Cold War II. Fulda Gap zeitgeist all over again.

Still say Putin's best chance is Trump. Only safe way out for Russia is Trump solidly ensconced as CiC of the US military.