> the British Royals, Biden, Obama.
Wouldn't they be 'fronts'?
What about Rockefeller, Rothschild, DuPont, Vanderbilt, Kennedy, Morgan, Goldman and Oppenheim? And Schiff and Warburg?
Aren't we witnessing a fight between family powers and we are just in the middle hoping the new equilibrium of forces will be fairer for us all?
This time we have a place to fight.
We've been taught.
The new families/powers will be under the watchful eye of places like this.
The battle is for ever…
> […] and yet you make every single call.
Not every single, but at some point we have to "cut" the reality.
These families own key business and key places (Suez Canal , Panama Canal, Rotterdam port, BIS &c.) whose interests seem to be in the middle of the wars and are essential in our (American?) way of life.
The "Democracy" (like that, in singular) we've seen that is just an illusion, so it's the "We the People".
Political nations are not ruled by "all" (Democracy/Demagogy) or by "one" (Kingdom/Tyranny). So maybe one "trace" is looking who owns the fundamental structures that support our social daily basis.