unless she authorized this post, and is getting paid royalties for it, the post is a violation of her privacy and for that reason alone is tasteless no matter what her virtue.
actually she has nothing to do with the post except maybe she could put in a claim . . .
did you pay her agent the correct licensing fees?
>>13929964 (pb)
wow that's really something.
thank you for pointing this out.
I suppose that 70 posts is a team effort
and at 4 AM it's probably an overseas team
don't worry I don't rat people out for the copyright cabals.
thin to none excuse if she shows up in your life and notice 'OMG' she's real and feel guilty about violating her privacy by posting that picture of her as such.
but it's just pixels, right? It's not a real person.
you're sure that all moral issues of posting such a picture are covered?
or you're just worried about budget and costs.
if your agency had to pay the fees that a girl of her type would require to perform in your stunt as you show her doing . . .
are you sure you're following all the protocols?
if her people show up and say 'by the way, you're wrong, they are not public and free to use' you'd be good with all the issues then, too, right?
it would be super if someone would read this out loud in a British announcers dialog voice like a Monty Python skit.
I can't help hearing it in that ironic twit voice vocalization. As I read it I think of the line "How to design box-girder bridges" from the "How it's done" skit . . .
How to Do it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJv8ZIiGL24
her husband vlad is upset at you, anon.
he wants you to pay her fees. . . and all penelties.
the agencies know the deal . . .
end of scary bullshit gaslighting
what is it that 'The Bard' had one of his characters say?
"Me thinks ye protest too much" . . .
anyway, whatever, you like her. I like her.
you want to humiliate her by showing naked pictures of her.
I want to make you think 'hum, maybe liking her photo and her means that really, if do find her hot and awesome that . . . I'd respect her and NOT post her.'
it's an alternative idea.
that's what this place is for.
don't post memes if you don't want commentary.
I'm hearing it as parady anon, that's fine.
I even posted a link to a Monty Python bit they did on a record-album (a set of them?) that unfolded into a giant box (I think that's the record).
anyway, whatever.
parody is a valuable for of satire and useful, as long as it isn't used to perpetrate a hoax.
you say that you have no sauce, I take you at your word. You did all the revealing you needed to do.
blah blah blah