>>13930889 pb
Fuckin oath they aren't, anyone that says otherwise better provide the line number where that manifests.
>anon really doesn't like front end programming, cloud platform automation ftw
Not sure exactly to what you are referring, so going verbose.
>>13929770 pb
>Shared thoughts on next feature to add to bakertools and asked for suggestions
>>13929800 pb
>Finally bump into the creator of what I have been updating
>>13929809, >>13929806, >>13929805
>Keking hivemind occurs
>>13929964
>Barely intelligible retard, equipped with a fresh boner from sleuthing some newsbot, loops in 2 anons showing mutual respect, into their wild, unsubstantiated speculation, piggybacking notables and tarnishing bakertools in the process.
>I can vouch for up to 0.7.2 (i think) as the original creator.
Agreed, that feels about when I started
>I wrote it in a cleanly coded, object oriented fashion so it could easily be audited.
And easily updated, thanks again, I pretty much know them shits back to front now.
>slander it as an autobaking tool
Rekon, how can you slander code, hence my req for a line number when they start spinning stories
>Any "tool" offered here should be READ BEFORE RUNNING.
100% cannot shill logic
>Doesn't matter what facefag offers it.
looks at included pic. I see what you did there.
Current version of bakertools does this