thanks again to the anon who highlighted colossus
so many questions
wish I could talk to Zo again
ty
that's telegram tho, the "we don't verify so anyone can pretend to be anyone" app
excellent. and weirdly contextual
zig zag
he's not completely wrong. you would really need to come to a "trust the plan" mentality about even 1776, if you could stop and actually wrap your head around the fact that the boston tea party was actually about a tax that was going to be levied solely against the East India Company, and the "revolution" was fought under the flag of the East India Company
It would be as if there was a tax levied against Apple, and the resulting "revolution" was fought under the flag of Apple
>It would be as if there was a tax levied against Apple, and the resulting "revolution" was fought under the flag of Apple
And if you could recognize that the British had an important reason to sucker a bunch of lineys to make the trip North so they could take possession of Canada before the French, and the "revolution" gave them a perfect way to do it.
And when you recognize that a myth of independence is a crucial part of a modern Platonic Republic
>the mayor in atlanta has admitted that keeping blacks locked up lowers murder rates
lockdowns save lives (in atlanta)
hilarious.
look what shill aj could have presented at any trial.
instead he'd rather be a test case against free speech
it's not even clear that the aj of 2010 is the same as the one since ~2016.
but even if it was, it's a shill.