Looks more and more like any weighted machine algos were not going to overcome a Trump win.
So, a call went out to shutdown critical precincts to remove Trump ballots and add Bidan ballots, while probably still continuing to adjust new scans to around a 1.2 Bidan / .8 Trump per ballot ratio. Still, remote intervention was needed to get the machines to print out in accordance with the Trump paper ballots that had been discarded. The remote intervention involved the MSSQL suite.
There should be, then, no correlation between an actual paper ballot vote total and what the machines spit out to the printer. The machines can be told what results to print after the fact using the software suite. That's why dems are touting original machine audits as "proof", and why AZ has them scared shitless.
Only hope is that some good guy got the digital ballot images IRL, before the precinct shutdowns. The ballot images would show how the ballot looked, as filled in by the voter, before any algos were run on it, and before it was adjudicated, if that was done as well.
Seriously think a 70-80% Trump tally was possible, because the even the Trump ballots that were destroyed may have been algo weighted at .8.
A victory of that magnitude, stolen by corrupt state governments who used a planted pandemic to justify flooding the precincts with fraudulent ballots to ensure it's success, if it's uncovered, will finish off the political structure in the US as we know it.