His Name Was Seth Rich.
When you are such a faggot shill all I have to do is put your name as the reason and everyone knows.
Many such cases
>>13944559
You realize I know that you are both baking and dropping your repetitive shit at the same time, right? You don't actually think you are fooling anyone, do you?
>You realize I know that you are both baking and dropping your repetitive shit at the same time, right? You don't actually think you are fooling anyone, do you?
Which is why now that I have called you out you will either ghost or hand off the dough immediately at the top of the next bread or sooner, as you always do when called out.
>>>13944180 Reminder: Pope Francis Suggests Changing The Words To The 'Lord's Prayer'
>bv, baker here. that is not me.
Sure it isn't, fucking retard.
Vatican jidf shill does this all the time right before his shift ends. He will claim the dough, add his spam and then ghost the next bread. Almost like he gets a bonus to get his shit inserted into notables.
>14c021 ←Vatican retard pretending to bake, notice his notable is green due to removal
>14c021 ← Immediately repost the same article but forgets to IP hop.
Here's the best part though, if you pay close attention you will realize the GB/Vatican Retard are the same person. (picrel)
>GB/Vatican Retard are the same person
I've been telling you guys for months. GB is the blocker for the COMMS faggots. He plays a bunch of different personas but they are all meant to aggravate and distract/annoy anons. "Look here, not over there."
When they were bakers he played "Rainman" to protect the bakers he liked but screaming Baker comped over nothing until anons ignored it so much they ignored real fuckery.
As Vatican shill he attacks good bakers and annoys/gaslights them until they quit.
And as GB he rushes in to protect the COMMS faggots whenever they are called out in the stream.
See, I call it out and the attacks go full force.
Same retards since day 1
This is why they went full retard when they found out I was a new BV. They knew what that meant. Now not only can I call out their shit, I can show their post histories and interactions to support it.
o7
>>13944744
>Maybe use those tools to find out who is, and who is not, JIDF.
>
>Getting banned for being JIDF is almost as annoying as being hated by the JIDF.
I see every post you make, Mr. Satanic Gibberish.
>May well be
>
>but the Vatican/Pope messaging is clearly linked to Q drops
-
Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made – but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.'
>the Anti-Jew fagging has zero to do with Q drops,
>in fact proves itself to be a direct attack on anything Q gave.
-
Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad
-
Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
>obvious which doesn't belong here
>but Jew-homo can't be stopped, so next best option:
>obvious which can be filtered with zero loss of fidelity to real research.
>say no to jew-homo: perma-filter that faggot
-
Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy,
As I said, as soon as he realizes he ain't getting his shit in the dough he'll hand off.
request you add >>13944647
Shill bread was locked/deleted.
Fill this one up before migration please.
Mr. Satanic Gibberish finally shows true colors.
Told you he was JIDF
>>13944898
>Catholics in Action/Catholics in America, hates Jews, protects Vatican.
>Not even sure what this is supposed to show.
-
Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
>There are no scred cows here.
This, they like to forget the only reason I ever started baking was because GB and crew refused to notable digs of mine of the Gallenkirch mafia, and Geronimo/John Podesta to it.