>>13945016 pb
>his name was "dwight" IIRC. He now plays "buckley" on AJ show. few have seen this
the bigger deal, to me, is how comfortable Hicks' mom was going on the Letterman show in 2009. Ask yourself, how comfortable would your mom be going on Letterman. Yet she handled it like a pro actor
Q Q&A today?
It was the extreme end of many predictions, starting with 2001 in 1968.
Gradually went from symbolic hints, to in your face neo passport 9/11/01 and literally terrorists flying planes into the WTC
It was a 30 year process.
COVID has similar.
>that damn clock
it seems like a never ending opportunity to make connections to me, which is an epistemological nightmare. Never seen it be right, have you?
Was talking about U2 & bolshevism yesterday.
Some anons wanted to rush to Dan's aid. I tried explaining my point.
Just thought of a counterexample that may enlighten the point.
Consider Queen. Liberal and subversive. And subversive in ways I don't like, such as hidden coding for dumb kids to think being gay would be a cool thing to do.
But I don't see the bolshevism in the same way that U2 has it. U2 is pro-banker, pro-oligarchy, bolshevik, whatever it takes to make the bankers win.
Queen was not bolshevik in the same way, while still liberal and subversive in ways I may not agree with.
Not sure if this may make sense to someone
>The handler sounds interesting
I know I found Hicks' c_A handler some years ago. IIRC, he was the interviewer when this pic was taken. Some low-key guy no one's heard of
I believe hicks was put into that position for a LONG-TAIL op based on foreknowledge.
kek. imagine how low your IQ would been to be to even think such gaslighting was believable.
dealing with hicks-jones is nothing to us
>Doesn't he resemble Hicks / Jones best friend and producer BOOTH
yes now you mention it I see that too
>simply because she asked for donations
your words are shilly Tracy but I never had a problem with asking for donations. It takes a lot of time to screw around with social media. But Q told them about "paytriots" and that was the end of that discussion. Let me check, was it before ##1835?
Yup. May 2018. Same timeframe as "trust wray"/"NSA has it all"/"blown cover on 2 clown operations, 44 more to go", etc.
I honestly think the account was being run by others at that time. I don't get a lot of agreement on that point.
>Is this guy supposed to be "Dwight"?
No that guy is "Ron Jonson" (fake name IMO) who is a big time lefty, worked with jones on the "bohemian grove" video, and made a documentary called "kubrick's boxes" where he was given access to kubrick's archives
He just could help himself but fully out Hicks-Jones on CSPAN
which part do you find "psycho" - not having a problem with donations, or pointing out the changes in Q?
Doesn't even sound like Trump. Sounds like someone who has worked on sounding like him