Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:14 a.m. No.13951816   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1836

>>13951798

I've now seen 2 Anons say they've built a scraper that doesn't need specific formatting.

But, one doesn't have a website and the other is only thinking about making one.

The format issue is just a convenient excuse by WATN to not show QR Notables.

They can stay down forever for all I care.

It looks like I'm not alone in that sentiment.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:22 a.m. No.13951854   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1880

>>13951831

The post counter is on the server side.

When posts are deleted by BV due to fuckery then the server side counter decrements.

Anons are on the browser side.

The counter Anons see is maintained via Java on that side.

So, if an Anon doesn't refresh after deletions then that counter can go to infinity and beyond for breads where deletions have taken place.

You didn't refresh so you're count was in the 800's.

When you go back later that is like a refresh and then you'll only see 751.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:26 a.m. No.13951870   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1906

>>13951836

The history with QR and WATN goes back a long ways and it's no secret the owner is tighter with QRB BO than QR BO/BVs.

Could it be a real issue for them no matter where it takes place?

Sure, I'll grant you that.

Bottom Line: WATN coder is not that good since others can get around the issue with no problems.

If there was a way for WATN owner to have someone else code it then that might be the sweet spot.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:31 a.m. No.13951894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13951880

Correct.

So, if you see 66 gorillion posting a shitload then all of a sudden it stops, chances are BV deleted and banned.

You'll prolly want to do a refresh.

Or, just let it be if it's no biggie for you to go into the 800's.

The Baker is the one that really has to keep an eye out because they'll Bake too early if they don't.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:37 a.m. No.13951926   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13951906

I share your idea of what the Notables should be.

But, many Anons and Bakers in 2021 like them to be full of useless bs unrelated to diggs/future proves past news.

Or, just dgaf which is the same thing by default.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:39 a.m. No.13951938   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2002

>>13951924

Not being able to get to pages on Telegram is prolly a blessing in disguise at this point.

Unless one is into LARPs and F&G stories then it's tragic not being able to get there.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:49 a.m. No.13951996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2031

>>13951974

>My question is, why a movement would block people, who support Q and Trump for asking real questions.

Because, they are F&G LARPers and not the real deal.

Both General McInerney and Gov DeSantis are not on there - it's not them.

So, of course they don't want any troublemakers like you on there asking too many questions.

DUH!

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:52 a.m. No.13952018   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2055

>>13952002

It's prolly not them.

McInerney for sure has said it isn't.

DeSantis is on other platforms where his posts are all the same, but he's supposedly on TG hawking coins?

GTFO.

As for Kayleigh, no idea but prolly not her either if the other bs is any guide.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 11:59 a.m. No.13952048   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13952031

Bank on it not being her.

It's one big F&G LARPfest taking place there.

Telegram is trash - they won't even do anything about Fake McInerney even tho Real McInerney has asked them to.

https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2021/01/25/a-fake-story-about-the-secretary-of-defense-stole-my-real-byline/

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 12:02 p.m. No.13952063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2071

>>13952055

>These TG accounts, whatever they really are, are not good for a movement of people that are researching in order to find out what is really going on.

No, they're not.

All they are good at is exposing shills and Anons with piss-poor discernment skills.

Anonymous ID: 78326d June 21, 2021, 12:30 p.m. No.13952218   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2263

>>13952188

>LOTS of normie eyes on WATN

Has the owner ever posted the stats?

Several months ago he wouldn't do it when Anons asked how many eyeballs he's getting.

Very sketchy as why would he want to hide that?

Even if small numbers it's still the truth and nobody non-shill would bust his balls for that.