Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor

After massive pushback, the #VitaminD / hospitalization study has now been fully published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Striking positive results, which if further verified would establish D status as the cornerstone of this crisis

https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1406929455419998211

Here's the study:

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/advance-article/doi/10.1210/clinem/dgab405/6294179

Results:

ICU assistance was required by 102 (12.2%) participants. Out of 447 patients treated with calcifediol at admission, 20 (4.5%) required ICU, compared to 82 (21%) out of 391 non-treated (p-value<0.0001).

In the Intention-to-Treat analysis, 21 (4.7%) out of 447 patients treated with calcifediol at admission died compared to 62 patients (15.9%) out of 391 non-treated (p=0.0001).

SO

4x as many people in the control group (NO Vic D given) were admitted to the ICU and 3x as many died.

https://twitter.com/stphnfwlr/status/1405959656950935554

>>13951507

>>13951815

>Q, this isn't what I signed up for.

why are u complaining to Q about things done by others?

>>13951780

yes, watn is down.

>>13951798

that is correct - aggregators need certain landmarks to pick up notables. if they are missing, the algorithm breaks down.

>>13951786

>They use qrb for their notables. It's a glowfag site.

of course, you're just a shill so you don't care about the truth

>>13952087

>Bc Trump/ Q/ Kayleigh/ DeSantis are working together, imo.

bit of a stretch, i think

'working together' means many things

much work done on a common goal is not done by the same exact people

I'd keep investigating, do a digg and record it in real time with a live screenshot video to see whether your suspicions are correct or that there are just some jacked off mods out there

>>13952100

>But we also need a real platform for all patriots.

yes - and run by patriots

would really like to see a platform where u don't have to fuggen signin

>>13952132

o7

>>13952095

>real anons don't glow

real anons use sauce and well-reasoned arguments to support what they say

Would u like some help?

>>13952147

>BV already backed me on this when it was made into notables like a week ago.

if u mean oss, that is not exactly a ringing endorsement

KEKKING BIGLY

>>13952159

>Ah yes. Kikes hate OSS. Thanks for outing yourself as a retarded glownigger, faggot.

do you know how to make a reasoned argument or do u just seek the approval of power mongers who anons never chose to "rule over them"?

>>13952167

not a biblical scholar, anon

what's your point?

>>13952172

we are all still here

anons are here doing the work and fighting the good fight, as best we can

>>13952188

>watn for normie eyez

yes.

i do hope it will be up and running again soon.

with all 3 boards contributing - but qr in particular would fall off quickly if bakers aren't careful with the formatting. have posted on this before - many times - giving examples. but it's hard to gain ground due to factors beyond anons' control.

so we all do the best we can with what we have.

SHADILAY ANONS

Never give up.

>>13952217

>let me just say that repeatedly referring to others here as anons makes you a prime suspect of trying to build consensus, based around the idea that "you're speaking for everyone"

i am expressing an opinion.

what would you like me to call anons instead?