>I know, let's try prohibition.
>That will strengthen our credibility!
It's like they can't help but fuck up everything they touch, and it's very fun to watch.
>I know, let's try prohibition.
>That will strengthen our credibility!
It's like they can't help but fuck up everything they touch, and it's very fun to watch.
You know you don't stand a chance when even a CNN reporter thinks you are absolutely full of shit.
I made this for you. Take your time. It's a lot to process.
Decaf, actually. Had to switch it up. Getting too old for caffeine past a certain time in the day. FML, amirite?
You don't seem to understand that there's always been a plan that the public sees, and one that the public (including the DS) doesn't see. Wonder how far back election fuckery goes, huh?
First, I think it's important to realize they are all criminals, so Loeffler and Purdue losing was part of the DS plan anyway, regardless of what you say (which is correct) that they didn't "lose" the vote. Second, you think that the younger Deal losing his life in a fireball was an accident? Third, doesn't matter how "red" a state is, they are all fucking comp'd glowfaggots working for the same fuckers that are working for the DS. And yes, it's going to be revealed that Fuchs has ties directly to Abrams. They are all criminal shitbags. Every single last one of them. Atlanta is the south's DC.
>well we're waiting.jpg
KEK'd.
Lulling all these anons to sleep worked so effectively that "Qanon" is now every few news stories throughout the day on your favorite MSM channel, and people are looking into things for themselves as every institution we're taught to put our faith/trust in proves to be the opposite of what they claim. So basically you're telling me the C_A suck-started a shotgun, and the only real reason you typed that reply is to try and strike fear into anons reading it as if it was some sort of "Operation Trust" thing?
K.
>Think the vast amount of hospital beds that just aren't there.
Are you saying there's a shortage of hospital beds? That sounds like a baseless claim. A conspiracy theory.
>Maybe President Trump will buy the concept and use as a framework for his new social media platform.
Not like it's never been tested anywhere before, amirite?
They allow tits, though.
Sorry, yes.
I don't partake in that sort of thing, but there was this discussion a while back about this being a "Free Speech" zone. So what changed? Just curious fren. TY for taking the time to read my response.