>>1394586
IS FRANCE KINDA CONTROLLED BY THE POPE?
a pickle is also a rundown in baseball.
if iran is between the pickle lines, then iran is "in a pickle" between two players.
the US and France, i believe.
"all kinds of files and emails" makes me think of the podesta/dnc/wikileaks drop.
without naming him, for REASONS.
holy fuck someone please acknowledge this:
France answers to the Archpriest of the Diocese of Rome.
which is fine - just install someone else, doesn't matter who they are, EVERY FRENCH PRESIDENT is automatically an "honorary proto-canon" of the Basilica of St. John Lateran.
even if it's only in title, they answer to Rome.
>Who recently visited the WH?
Macron
>What was their purpose?
Iran Deal - don't pull out
>Coincidence?
No
>What about the safety & security of the world?
No - about financial implications
>Will the EU resort to protecting the deal so the money flow remains in place?
Trying
>Who controls elected leaders?
The people, we would hope.
>Who do elected leaders report to?
In France, the only thing this points to is that the pres is an honorary canon of the cath. church, so technically answers to the vicar general of the diocese of rome.
>Pickle.
>
>Will Iran expose the names of corrupt officials?
>
>Pickle.
>Will the US expose the names of corrupt officials + con deal?
veiled threat.
>We await your answer [48].
>
>On Guard.
English wording of a French phrase.
maybe just a red hat, don't put him in too awkward of a spot.
it still feels like he's trying to implicate the papalcy somehow, or maybe the catholic church in general.