> "I said I would drop some science […]"
Thanks for that, but this is not science but technical mambo jambo.
Why 4 systems and not 5? or 20?
"Spiritual system"? How does the "spirit" fits in that science?
One of the main issues we have in our homologated democracies is the "scientific fundamentalism"; the so called "science" can explain anything or even assure us how hot/cold/healthy/terrible the future world will be. That while "experts", universities departments, NGO's and others load their pockets with taxpayers' money and mandate population lock downs.
If you are gonna post "science" you need a theory (or "philosophy") of science.
"Science", like that, in singular, doesn't exist; different rules apply to different sciences.
A triangle in revolution from one of its sides generates a cone, isn't it? In what color?
You see? The laws of the Chemistry are different from the laws in Geometry.
In the tragedy of humans life "ignoramus et ignorabimus" so we will never reach the "universal science" and like the good butcher we can only try to carve the reality from its natural junctures.
Sciences will never able to explain everything (not everything is connected with everything and not everything is disconnected with everything).
Try to post the bibliographic references, too.