>>13964715

>>It is the action of a shill to use the status of baker to cause purposeful division, if you have baked with that banner before than you got the same reactions previously, yet you persisted. Who's the shill?

>And just to be clear, I don't mean to imply you are a shill, or what is in your heart/mind. Only pointing out your actions for you to see from a secondary perspective. Bassically, if all your banner is going to do is cause needlessly drama, why do it in the first place? Don't we have enough without it?

Dont apologize or give ground to the shill. They did it for every reason a shill would do it. ONLY to piss off those who take this seriously. Its been used before with the same negative reactions from anons. Its just pissed that they got shut down for once.

>>13964864

HEY, thats natural and should be included in the banner.

>>13964897

>The one with the Q post explaining there is Q and then anons.

And that not all anons are real! We see you

>>13964913

>Or we can just continue to argue over stupid ass banners forever.

Thats gonna happen either way.

>>13964945

>also this. #17470 had fucked up notables initially, it was graveyard shift and it took a little screaming to get them back into form, but it had a non-comped banner. I'd say discernment trumps conformity.

Dough continues to be fucked up, just saying.

>>13964913

When you can guaranty that one anon one vote is all that happens, it may be useful. However we all know that isnt possible.

>>13964977

>and when it does,

When it does? WTF?

>>13964989

>no. "likes" is open to bot abuse.

That would never happen, its why TOR posting and VPN's are so cool, cause abuse is never the idea!

>>13965006

>Seems like you do not agree that there is Q and then anons.

Seems to me that Q restating not all anons are indeed anon concerns you. It should.

>>13965008

>I was making social media before social media was a phrase. "likes" doesn't work in an anonymous system.

Neither does a vote that is anything but one vote, one person. So any other lessons oh great and mighty socialist media guy?