>>>13968992, >>13969016, >>13969030, >>13969041, >>13969066 NCSWIC Torrent? Over 31 TiB size. (Date posted 4/5/202 - 4/5 = D5?)
Baker, you missed the counter notable.
>>13969964 (PB)
>>13970094 (PB)
Yes, they are a thing.
>>13970118 (PB)
>No one has nominated it.
I have nominated it. As I said, you are the baker, you decide what goes in the notables. You decided that a faked screenshot of a torrent with no sauce provided was notable, now you can decide to set the record straight.
Anon is watching, baker.
BV not sure what you're trying to prove with that, because I was not claiming to not be the original anon who posted the counter. I'm saying that I nominated it to be notable by posting it and the baker can choose to add it to notables.
Notables do not need to be nominated by other anons.
Did you catch this one?
>>13969940 (PB)
>Hey OSS, since I'm doing such a great job can I have this one shitpost?
>Again, I am OSS. Baker was talking to me.
Explain the fake screenshot BV. Can you find the torrent?
Is there a reason for it to be in notables uncontested despite clear evidence that it is fake?