Thank you for visiting the website of the Istituto per le Opere di Religione (IOR).
http://www.ior.va/content/ior/en.html
Related news:
https://www.marshallnewsmessenger.com/ex-head-of-vatican-bank-goes-on-trial-for-embezzlement/article_0f10e97a-5574-11e8-bb40-bf295fc92c97.html
I recall anons digging up the fake NSA in Dec or Jan. Looks like they've kept busy.
https://nationalsecurityaction.org/newsroom/
>On the other hand, if Iran exposes the corrupt, white hats maintain the narrative that we're cleaning house as we discover new corruption… that is Drain the swamp.
My vote is here. Iran's Minister of Foreign Affairs Zarif has already threatened to talk. He should. Coming from him as not only an outside source, but potentially a participant, may be more reliable to the general public.
>However, we don't look like we're in control as much.
We know better though. It was our breaking he deal that got the (snow)ball rolling. I like the idea of Iran naming names while we confirm and take action regarding those w/in our borders that took part. IMO, it fits with >>>/patriotsfight/74.
Iran revealing the players, vs. POTUS & admin revealing the players, looks less bipartisan and keeps POTUS neutral for the sake of optics.
Personal dislike for reddit doesn't negate the fact that useful info was found there. Diamonds are dug up from mud every day. Q has previously linked The NY Times, Youtube, Twitter, Politico, NPR, NBC, etc. SOme of those are shit, yet, the data needed can be found with discerning eyes.
Point: The SOURCE/MESSENGER doesn't matter as much as the MESSAGE. Stop bitching & trying to make anons question where the message came from. It's too late, we GET THE MESSAGE. You should too.
Nice try though, faggot shills.
Good point anon. We have it ALL, it's just a matter of releases it first at this point.
>Will Iran expose the names of corrupt officials? NO THEY WANT TO KEEP MONEY AND STATUS QUO
>Will the US expose the names of corrupt officials + con deal? YES….WE WILL HAVE TO EXPOSE
I'm all for Iran making the exposure, This makes me think though, can we TRUST Iran to do so?
Making the announcement about EU participants would be the best first step, then the EU players expose the US players.
Whatever as long as POTUS hands stay clean, drop the info!!!
http://www.americanpartisan.org/2018/05/who-was-qanon-and-why-should-you-care/
is crap.
[Example]:
Through it all, there were some who narrowed their eyes and called BS on the whole thing. Half of Q’s predictions ended up being absolute crap, such as his assertion that “Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM – 8:30 AM EST on Monday – the morning on Oct 30, 2017.”
That wan't Q's post, Q replied to this post. Pic related. NOTE: Q NEVER MENTIONED WHAT YEAR, as some anons pointed out earlier. See notables.
TIMESTAMP: [48]
NoName responded to Bachmann, of course he did…
McCain Slams Bachmann For ‘Unwarranted And Unfounded Attack’ On Clinton Aide
https://thinkprogress.org/mccain-slams-bachmann-for-unwarranted-and-unfounded-attack-on-clinton-aide-16036c2471fa/
48 hours for exposure on who profited from the Iran Deal
The deadline wasn't for us to keep track of, as far as something will drop in exactly 48 hours. It was a warning, a message to Iran (I think Min. of Foreign Affairs Zarif bc he's already threatened to name names), or for anyone else who wants to sing before it's eventually revealed anyway.
EXCEPT, it's dammed if you do, fucked if you don't for those involved. Caught in a pickle indeed.
>I THINK we can TRUST the PEOPLE of IRAN.
THAT, I can agree with! Even with their internet cut, they can get the word out. Wouldn't be the first time…