Yeah. I'm a fan of qresearch, but this is always in the front of my mind.
When I feel myself altering my IRL rhythms, I back away. To some extent there's really no denying that qresearch is, in fact, a psyop. Just have to decide how cognizant one must be to use the tool instead of be tooled.
No sense jumping from the frying pan into the fire.
Was thinking today that the very best person (or group of people) to sue Facebook would be the one who doesn't have and has never had a Facebook account, but is listed in their database anyway. This person would likely have family members who have included the never-joined plaintiff and has been included in photos.
Then there would be discovery to prove they have profiles on everyone - not just those who have signed the user agreements.
Then there would be one hell of a case.
The problem is the legal system is set up to protect and fund the attorneys. So I guess the key is to find someone who fits the never-joined profile and then match them up with an attorney who is good and could win, but fully understanding that all the money would go to the attorney.
Would you willingly lose your sense of privacy to make such a case when you never joined in the first place? It's a large favor to ask when it means your life would be turned upside down.
Several months ago, before I ever came to 8ch, I saw Corsi argue that Q made a typo in one of his decodes.
That's when I knew that Corsi was a nobody.
The one thing I knew instinctively is that to take such time with so many crumbs,
Q would not make a typo.
Except that eventually Q made a typo. But that was in a chatty update, not one of the crumb threads.
There are different types of comms. That I've learned.
Never really saw anyone try to sort them out, though.
And yes, it still bugs the heck out of me that the images are not yet decoded.
Always wondered why we never dig Trump's bloodlines - so very little is available - when we dig everyone else.