Anonymous ID: 80c9ee May 13, 2018, 10:31 a.m. No.1397978   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1394586

This really needs deliberation? The MSM seems to think it was a good idea and we should have stayed in it. I say, go ahead and expose it for what it is, plus those who tried to sell us down the river. It will be interesting to see how the MSM handles it. They still seem to think the Climate Accord was a good idea.

Anonymous ID: 80c9ee May 13, 2018, 10:51 a.m. No.1398203   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8263

The problem I see, though, is that if we take out InfoWars outright, the rest of alt media is at risk. They have to fall of their own accord.

Anonymous ID: 80c9ee May 13, 2018, 11:01 a.m. No.1398303   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8325

AJ/JC screwed up when they forgot that they WERE professional journalists. It shouldn't have mattered to them whether or not there was a Q or what he was saying about making money on the movement. There's plenty out there to cover. And prior to Q, they did cover it. They got attached to it. Q's comments were about those who were trying to make money specifically from the project, such as maybe Q-Universe. What would those guys have done once it was all over?

Anonymous ID: 80c9ee May 13, 2018, 11:15 a.m. No.1398445   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1398368

Yes, there are some. SH comes to mind. Some of the alt guys fit the description. MSM has wanted to take out InfoWars for a while because they felt he was a threat to them. So anything to do with InfoWars has to be handled with care, lest we play into their agenda. Attrition, given their response, is likely. Hopefully, that's enough.