anyone else picking up on this oddity?
how does it happen that one link is broken here, but the parser fixes it and drops the other at .pub?
this smells of intent.
not sure which is my favorite now. thanks anon.
still common in fencing, as i understand.
holy fucking source that shit.
fake clean rooms?
clean rooms meant to look like clean rooms, for video conferences.
here's a thread of thoughts i plucked out of various Q posts, regarding phones in clean rooms.
it's of interest to me - this is where things unravel, and why clinton access to FVYE sites might mean something bigger.
Q post 20: Why were certain rooms in the WH renovated?
Q post 20: Where was the meeting on Monday?
Q post 20: Why aren’t phones allowed in this room (one of many).
Q post 20: What firm was contracted to conduct the renovations?
Q post 541: What [19] people are currently meeting in a 'safe' room [heavily guarded]?
Q post 541: Why did everyone leave their phones/all other electronic devices in Room 239?
Q post 959: Big meeting.
Q post 959: Cell phones left at door.
Q post 999: Phones were allowed in.
Q post 999: These people are stupid.
Q post 1000: 'H'
Q post 1092: We love phones!
Q post 1092: No name should know better.
i am going to guess that H is huma here - and post 999 references epstein's island complex.
Q is saying that when phones are allowed in clean rooms, secrets leak out. you can't keep things hidden when you let in OUTSIDE COMMS, which is another phrase Q repeats over and again.
we wouldn't know about noname's meeting location without cell phone pics.
epstein's island wouldn't be filled in without cell phone pics.
now we find a company which builds their own realistic fake-rooms.
think about the implications, when people THINK they're in a safe/clean room, or vid-conf with a safe/clean room.