Fox has a news article about the Champlain Tower collapse and the person writing the article says the 'building facade collapse' seeming unaware that more collapsed than is left standing.
It's because it's almost as if one full building is still left standing. Half of it is gone, but the building was built with two wings.
so now the part that were connected look as if just the facade of it is gone. A whole wing is gone!
"review the sinkage numbers" of all buildings built on the same kind of topography?
a 'civil engineer' in the comments says that 'all the buildings in the surrounding area . . . '
must be reviewed.
what if the review says 'huh, Miami should only have buildings that are no more than such and so height (I have no idea what that number is).
I think at that point you've gotta say it starts getting political.
rattling is one way to make a sound.
the tactic of 'constant rattle' is a kind of aggitation.
the constant and repetitive repeitition repeating repeadly is designed to become an annoyance.
partisans and 'pro-ethno-trolls' love to do this kind of rattle. others use it in an ape form to make the first ones seems as fools, or craven, because that constant rattle is rather annoying.
the tuning of a motor, or the method of using it, can produce an effect like the way that a cabin of a vehicle on the highway can be made to be acustically uncomfortible by rolling both back windows down to be only so high. A resonance happens. It's very loud and annoying. the repetition of repeating repetitive repeating is like that. the real subject of it is obvious. the ones who do it know who they are.
they are a constant drip that keeps on dripping.
repetitious repetition repeating repeatedly is, indeed, a 'the windows are at that place where you need to either roll them up or roll them down.'
and then they repeat their repeating making it all about them.
saddly, they have only been seen wobbling.
none of them have 'fallen down' (been removed from office)
all the same grumbling letchers seem firmly festered within this bread.
all of this banter is fake and crap and should be shitcanned.
software charltanism is outlined by companies like the one she was president of.
it was 'constantly rebrand'
they wrapped and rewrapped and rewrapped the same crap over and over, obsoleting the old paradigm' was the constant effort.
everyone else would be declared 'untrained'.
that way they could take over the hiring for projects. Only their certified 'specialists' in their paradigm would be qualified.
but don't worry they will provide 'training' for all the other team people, and legacies who want to become part of it. Or just do a Riff, and hire fresh? (the name tells me what they would recommend).
no matter how talented, the engineer is always told that they lack skills.
no matter how many courses they take, they never know the newer paradigms. They are treated as technicians. They are seen as 'seat fillers' for a cost plus contract.
only the ones at the top are ever said to be good enough to decide anything.
no thank you.
I'm sure they profile and probe
the ever evolving paradigm mongers are disreputible. That she came from Colombia Engineering makes a lot of sense. To them engineering is 'seat filling' for cost plus contract bandits.
they don't do engineering, but human resources. but to them that is 'slave seating' for autists at a cost plus seat on a fully funded project.
the constant banter of flavored and named bakers attempts to disrupt the board through spurious gossipy banter.
those who call out the bakers by name and participate in the discord script at that level are obvious larpers who always seek to defame the board.
this one participates in the psyop with the horny-dog and then scolds others for posting nudes.
shut up with your typecasting falsities.
cringe 'did anyone ever tell you you seem' post
guy as a collection of his dogs -master love you hard-on look , probably took it while puppy was pertruding, and posts them all bread every bread and we're suppose to pretend it's not that?
I hit it out of the park. Why did those dog images trigger me so much.
and I figured it out.
and I say it out loud
and that makes you angry?
oh well.
you're the one with the dog-image psyop, dude.
not me.
I tell the world what you do and that makes you angry? do you think I care. I'm blunt,I'm too the point, I'm unfiltered at times. But I don't post pictures constantly with faces of people on a sex hormone ready to 'go up stairs' or with gape-face, etc.
constantly.
I don't do that.
but from time to time I am blunt, and crude describing what you (you) really do in your posts, psy-op dog poster.
do you think you can run constant psyops and not have some blow-back?
those who observe and say out loud what you do in clear langauge that is easy to understand, and with the same level of crudeness that you use in all your efforts (psyop dog poster) . . that upsets you?
by the way suddenly when it's upsetting that a person pegs you dead on as what you are and says it clearly you can't object to what is said, just how it's said.
and you even revealed as the one who Turretposts 'SGibbie' all day and every day.
you are the 'constant scibbie sayer'
The cronic dog-poster chronically posts 'SGibbie', claiming no remorse, and knowingly; Chronic as well, with repetitious repetitition repeating repeatedly conchronically, like a chonch shell being used as a trumpet as an annoyance.
if he's live on a feed, he's probably not here posting at the exact same time . . . ya think
Dan, maybe.
I used to like the song 'Atomic Dog' so it's not that I don't think fun dog, wagging dogs, etc aren't hopping and happy.
but the over doing of it, the constant display, the never ceasing nor relenting, the always in your face, like a branding . . .
what gets a brand? let me see? Cattle. Slaves.
Bitch bakers!