>>13981516 (lb)
>It must have been a calculated loss and this choice must have been considered to cause less damage overall.
I think he looked at the situation at the time, saw the election steal, based on his "mishandling" of the pandemic, which had to be continued long enough to secure mail in votes. After a dem win, a vaccine, possibly, could have been planned, manufactured in China, for 4 or 5 years down the road, and sold for obscene amounts.
I'm going to say Trump knew the election would be stolen, so keep the traitors in place, don't concede, and let them out themselves trying to fuck up his defense. Take names and then kick ass when the timing is right.
Vaccine, was a different matter. One was coming, like it or not, so best to go with a somewhat known entity (mRNA from HIV research) from Western outfits rather than an unknown from China.
He offered to buy all, in a futures like deal, to suck in the pharma sociopaths looking for a quick buck today rather than risk being stiffed by Chinese interests a few years out. Then, he gave it away in the US, and the rest of the world followed suit rather than risk getting outbid by Trump subsidized outfits.
So, very possible it was a LOTE situation, IMO. Not an easy call.
Bad guys now have to keep the pandemic going, and do a FUD job on the current vaccines, in order to keep the Chinese vaccine plan in place.
Could be, not sure, current vaccines have some ability to be effective against strains yet to be released. Explains, anyway, Trump pushing it.
Trump saying kids don't need it is essentially saying older people do. Extrapolating out, virus could be meant to take out older people, who hold more wealth, to provide a mechanism to siphon off that wealth to the TPT rather than the kids. Did that happen in MI/MN//NJ/NY/PA? Not sure if the Bidan group has been fucking with current inheritance law/taxes thus far, or not, but it may be in the cards USA wide.