Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 2:27 p.m. No.13983302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3323 >>3328 >>3438

>>13983277

See how it works, Anons?

All day shills have been posting that F&G McAfee cap on both QR and /pol/.

Anons in both places call it out.

Then, look what happens next.

A look at what those kooky Anons online are doing article.

SSDD.

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 3:04 p.m. No.13983548   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13983438

Maybe they would pick something like that up, but prolly not.

Why?

Because it looks like they are the ones doing the 4AM TP style making up shit to flood the boards with via their low wage shill army.

In other words, the stories are already set to go after the shills do their thing on the boards.

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 3:16 p.m. No.13983640   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13983602

>-eyed-as-contributing-factor

So, Dr. Scientist, can you 100% rule out climate change?

>As a scientist I can never 100% rule out much of anything - but prolly not much of a chance of that here.

So, you can't 100% rule it out, huh?

Our top story tonight: Climate change prolly contributed to the collapse.

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 3:35 p.m. No.13983755   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13983741

>John McAfee secret stash of government data WEEKS before the collapse

Baker/Notetaker, that's a hit piece article saying online morans are spreading rumors again.

It's not a substantive article about McAfee info.

Please remove or change description to denote what it really is.

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 3:47 p.m. No.13983838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3886 >>3914

>>13983818

>>13983277 John McAfee secret stash of government data WEEKS before the collapse?

Baker/Notetaker, once again that's a hit piece and not new info.

The article is all about Anons spreading bs about a F&G Twitter cap that McAfee didn't author.

What's the point in calling this kinda shit out in this and the last few breads if you're just gonna make it a Notable?

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 3:59 p.m. No.13983906   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3935

>>13983886

Change the description then.

Because bottom line is the McAfee tweet the whole article is based upon is F&G.

So, as it stands now, anyone reading the Notable description is fed false info.

Anonymous ID: d2f946 June 25, 2021, 4:02 p.m. No.13983934   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13983914

It's not that complicated.

The article's main goal was to call out Anons online for spreading unverified rumors.

When the reality is that Anons on both QR & /pol/ have been calling out shills all day for posting that F*G Twat cap that McAfee didn't author.