>Haven't been here for a while
So, see you next bread then?
Your gay-themed projection meme says these Q research boards should be for "debating zionism"? Awe, you almost hid your hand but blew it. These are Q research threads to research the Q drops.
See ya.
Thank you, Baker for this bread which others are about to receive.
LAST BREAD, #39 SUMMARY:
After some great success in dating the NSA_TRAF_CAM ROT (1 thru 3) pics, LisaMI6, and LONDON2847 pics as being 25DEC2013 (+/- 1 day) in bread #38, we decided to take a break from the EMBANKMENT pics to turn fresh eyes on Piccadilly Circus.
One of our detail-oriented anons brought up a detail detail in the RED BUS pic that had been bothering him. Further discussion and digging revealed the item to be an attachment (aka fixing) used to hang Christmas street decorations above Coventry Street in 2013. Could not be 2014 because the Communications House was gutted and refurbished in March of 2014 and would not again appear as in the Q pic. Could not have been 2012 because of the bus sign being changed sometime between October and December 2013 per StreetView. It was a long discussion and unfortunately no one made a notable nom for the fact that we had just narrowed RB to sometime between mid-November 2013 to early January 2014 when the Coventry street decorations were removed. Perhaps someone would like to do a PB notable on that.
And lastly, in the last bread, but not least, we took note in one of the Piccadilly pics, of what appears to be a "75% off" sign in the window of Cool Britannia. Understand, we had already found evidence of Christmas holiday evergreens in the flower boxes above the store entrance which would be present from mid-November to early January. This evidence of the type of late Christmas season sale has the potential to really narrow the timeframe for the Piccadilly pics to a time between the last two weeks of December 2013 to early January 2014 fitting really nicely with our previous digs' timeframes.
Also, an anon noted a compelling similarity of a woman in the RB pic who is dressed like the woman in the Winter Wonderland pics who has a purse slung to her hips, is wearing boots and a "Lisa" jacket. It should be noted that the RB and the WW pic were dropped by Q in the same post. So, we may have a WW/RB connection by woman in both pics. Don't think that was notabled in last bread either.
As we begin bread #40, we are just starting to dig on those 75% off sale signs. Circumstantially, to see one of those 75% off signs during what we already know to be during the holidays, seems to point to a time about a week or two before Christmas when CB would want to discount any Christmas-themed or Winter seasonal items.
>Who the fuck are you calling a shill, anon?
I think, YOU? As you always support any shill that comes here. Remember you are on a short leash.
Found a vid capturing the 75% off signs at COOL BRITANNIA posted 24DEC2013.
https://youtu.be/JMzcTW8RT3w
Caps of 2 windows showing the signs. Also, there are similar 75% signs inside the store in the vid. This vid shows that the sale was not an after-Christmas sale. My working theory on that sale is that it started a week or two before Christmas, and is intended to liquidate Christmas-themed/Winter merch.
Need to find vids/pics to find when the sale campaign started.
Posting that short vid.
>Not a match as crowded sidewalks. AND CROWDED STREETS. Little, if any, type of vehicular traffic in GAVIN's vids that evening. Could it be that NYE celebration would present the power to pause the flow of buses and other vehicular traffic inside one of London's most popular locations?
I suffered thru all of his London vids too. But I def recall him saying they had shut down all traffic to Piccadilly on NYE.
The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee has released a three-part report by Barbara Boyd, exposing: (1) the British strategic impetus for the ongoing coup against Donald Trump, (2) the Institute for Statecraft/ Integrity Initiative as a British military directed propaganda operation involving “clusters” of cooperating journalists and political figures aimed at inciting populations in the U.S., Britain, and Western Europe against Donald Trump and Russia, and smearing and censoring any individuals dissenting from their "approved” viewpoints, and 3) how British intelligence and their Integrity Initiative propaganda operatives werethe actual meddlers in the U.S. 2016 Presidential election and how they continue to subvert the Trump Presidency. The full report is available at lpac.co/three-part.
The report draws on the December 18, 2018 House of Lords Report, “UK Foreign Policy in a Shifting World Order,” which outlines British strategic policy in the wake of Brexit. The Lords make repeated refer- ences to maintaining the Rules Based International Or- der, which is shorthand for the modern British imperium developed in the wake of World War II. Boyd reviews the history of that Order, demonstrating its actual character as the sponsor of endless wars and economic devastation. According to the Lords, Donald Trump is their Number One problem in maintaining their Order, something which has been repeatedly echoed by acolytes of this Order in the United States. The Lords describe Trump as a disrupter and state that the “Special Relationship” between the United States and Britain, at the center of all British foreign policy, can survive one term of Trump but not two.
The Lords describe the Special Relationship as a largely hidden force across the U.S defense and intelli- gence communi- ties, and as particularly revered on both sides of Congress. The Lords otherwise focus on India, China, and Russia, which nations, along with the United States, are described as the keystone na- tions in future British foreign pol- icy. They describe Russia as a state in decline which can be contained if NATO is strengthened to British specifications and economic isolation continues. The British have already joined China’s AIIB and the Belt and Road Initiative, and the Lords state a clear intent to manipulate these Chinese development initiatives to their advantage. They are seeking to deepen security ties with India in addition to their extant economic and trade ties through the Commonwealth. The significance of Lords’ imperial concentration on these four nations becomes clear when compared to the proposals of Lyndon LaRouche concerning the same exact four nations. LaRouche has repeatedly demonstrated that these four nations represent, potentially, the most powerful and productive economic force the world has ever known, which if joined together for development purposes under a new fixed exchange rate monetary system, could launch a new scientific and cultural revolution – a new Renaissance, on behalf of all mankind. (pt. 1- post too long)
(pt 2- post was too long)
Chillingly, the Lords describe their second problem as populations in both the United States and Britain, who have been given too much access to information and believe “conspiracy” theories rather than official government accounts of their actions. They propose to answer this by controlling public opinion through censoring and controlling cyberspace.
The Integrity Initiative demonstrates the intended actions behind the Lords’ Diplospeak, the iron fist within the glove. It was recently exposed when its internal documents were hacked. This British military operation, funded by NATO, the British Foreign Ministry, the British Defense Ministry, the U.S. State Department, the Smith-Richardson Foundation, and, now, Facebook, has smeared British Labor leader Jeremy Corbin and Scottish nationalists, infiltrated the Bernie Sanders campaign in Iowa in 2016, attacked those dissenting from British imperial views internationally, and circulated entirely false claims about Russia and Putin, in pursuit of their central objective, creating the same war fever against Russia in the United States and Europe as presently exists in Britain. In their first public event in Seattle, they argued that the U.S. population had to be mobilized to fight a war with Russia.
In Britain, the Integrity Initiative ran “Operation Iris,” a public perception management operation with respect to the March 2018 poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia Skripal, in Salisbury, England. In- tegrity Initiative contacts include Pablo Miller, who was Sergei Skripal’s MI6 handler. The purloined documents also demonstrate overlapping personnel between British
figures involved in the coup against Donald Trump, specifically the intelligence circle around former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, and the Integrity Initiative. The Dearlove circle includes Christopher Steele, author of the discredited dirty dossier about Trump, Pablo Miller, and Sir Andrew Wood, the former British Ambassador to Russia. The Initiative is collaborating in the U.S. with the Center for Naval Analysis, the Center for European Policy Analysis, and the U.S. State Department’s Global Engagement Center in propaganda operations targeting the population of the United States. It has hired John Rendon, known as the “man who sold the Iraq War” for its U.S. operations. Those reviewing the hacked Initiative documents appropriately compare it to Operation Mockingbird, the infamous CIA Cold War operation which had more than one hundred U.S. mainstream journalists writing and printing what the CIA wanted the American public to think and censoring opposing views.
In the third part of her report, Boyd explores what is presently known about the British operation against Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential campaign and subsequently. This is an all-out effort to prevent any Trump second term and, hopefully, to cause his removal from the Presidency much sooner than that. Boyd argues that the Steele dossier, the British intelligence product backed by former CIA chief John Brennan, the Obama White House, and the State Department, is a fabricated intelligence product that no sane intelligence agency of- ficial would credit. It is entirely likely that there were no actual “inside” Russian sources for this fictional intelligence hoax. When the British side of the operations against Trump are examined, the exercise undertaken in the report’s third part, it is impossible not to conclude that the British were the real meddlers in the 2016 Presi- dential election and have continued to lead the insurrec- tion and sedition against Trump’s presidency.
Part I
The British Lords’ First Priority: No Second Term for Donald Trump
The British House of Lords report with accompanying papers and appendices, is entitled, “UK Foreign Policy in a Shifting World Order.” The discussion which follows is drawn from the report itself, its accompanying papers and appendices, and other recent statements of the key participants in shaping the report’s conclusions.
In the report itself, the Lords huff that Donald Trump has completely imperiled the globalist “post-War rules based International order” as well as the “special relationship” between the United States and Britain. They say this while, at the same time, reveling in their success in infiltrating and controlling the United States following World War II. The covert defense and intelligence relationships flowing from the special relationship are sufficient, they argue, to survive one term of Trump. But, not two. Otherwise, they are terrified by the activation of the “people” in the Brexit vote in Britain and in the 2016 election in the United States. They cite the free ability of individuals to access information as the central threat to their ability to rule. To answer this, they intend to create censorship and propaganda regimes which would make George Orwell’s fictional Ministry of Truth in his novel, 1984, seem like child’s play.
Those with longer memories will recall that John McCain and others responded to Trump’s election with bellicose incitements to invoke NATO’s Article 5, claiming that alleged Russian election meddling in the 2016 presidential election was an act of war and that Trump was out to destroy the very same “post war, rules based international order.” John Brennan subsequently reported that the British, and their NATO satraps, like Estonia, began feeding him leads about Trump–Russia collusion in late 2015 because they feared Trump would destroy the special relationship. MI6’s Christopher Steele followed that up by telling his Justice Department collaborator Bruce Ohr, that he was absolutely desperate to prevent Trump’s election and would do just about anything on behalf of that mission. And then, after the election, the Senate Intelligence Committee kicked off its absurd investigation of Russian electoral dirty tricks which, it was claimed, elected Donald Trump. In their first public hearing, a parade of British experts or Americans, like Roy Godson, who, nonetheless, salute the flag of Empire, enthralled very stupid Senators with tales about super potent Russian “active measures” capable of inducing underclass Americans into voting for Trump based on racist Facebook memes, or cartoons which made fun of Hillary Clinton. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence viewing this stupid spectacle had to feel deep embarrassment on behalf of the United States.
To put things in perspective here, it’s useful to review, briefly, the history of this “rules based international order,” referred to over and over again in the House of Lords report. Promulgated by the Truman Presidency and Winston Churchill at the end of World War II, this “Order” preserved colonialism, albeit in modern institutionalized forms of debt slavery and deliberate genocidal underdevelopment for the bulk of the world’s population. This was against the intent of the American President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and much of the American population at the time. The IMF and World Bank, Bretton Woods institutions which Franklin Roosevelt wanted to use for world-wide economic development and to end British colonialism, became the overlords, instead, of an imperial financial system which enforced Malthusian population control and underdevelopment while securing vital mineral and other natural resources for the realm. This primary “alliance” also built a series of military bases throughout the world, “to project” imperial power, in their words, based upon British colonial policing and geopolitical stratagems.
>>14008374 (cont'd)
For a period of time, following the War, the U.S. and other advanced sector nations enjoyed economic prosperity. This is the period to which President Trump refers as the era of American “greatness.” It was the result of then-extant and new capital-intensive investments in U.S. infrastructure building, in new plant and equipment, and building out further the machine tool capacities that had dominated the war mobilization. It included great technological, scientific, and technological horizon programs, such as Kennedy’s Moon mission. But such programs, reflecting the American system of political economy of Alexander Hamilton, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin Roosevelt, all but ended by 1967, when London undertook its final offensive to once again control the world’s financial flows. The British chose the moment in which the U.S. was suffering from the financial and cultural impacts of the genocidal Vietnam War, to make their moves. On August 15, 1971, after a series of preliminary steps, they succeeded in taking down the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate currency system.
With the collapse of Bretton Woods, floating exchange rates, currency wars, and speculative financial gambling became the way of the world. Proposals for large-scale development were scrapped as too costly or financially unpredictable. The advanced sector’s economies were systematically deindustrialized and financialized with former industrial areas of whole countries turned into wastelands. Jobs were outsourced world-wide in pursuit of the cheapest labor possible. Food cartels replaced the agro-industrial units called family farms, and the U.S. rail grid was largely abandoned and consolidated, driving populations into urban areas and the coasts for mere sustenance. In place of productive jobs and a national mission, such as President Kennedy’s space program, the majority of citizens in the United States were offered the gig and service economy, drugs, pornography, sports, and Hollywood entertainment to fill their time on earth.
The new religion of “environmentalism” and its sub cult, anthropogenic climate change, were used to justify wholesale genocide through underdevelopment of the world, meeting the demands of Prince Philip and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands to reduce human population down to one to two billion people. “Science” became the land of statistics and information technologies, rather than the “science” which was the actual font of American greatness—the big ideas, bold experiments, and the constant discovery and creativity which characterized the harnessing of nuclear power and space travel to the Moon. Instead, the City of London, the private entity against which America fought a Revolution, became, once again, the center of all world finance. Its mantras, “free trade, free enterprise, and limited government,” were endlessly mouthed by anyone who wanted to become rich or famous.
Much of the success of this infiltration can be traced to British recognition of the simple fact that how individuals think about the world and whether their surrounding culture encourages or destroys human creativity, constitute the most important battlegrounds of strategic warfare and grand strategy. That is why Lyndon LaRouche starts just about every strategic analysis he makes by demonstrating that men and women are not animals, not beasts. The contrary assertion, that they are beasts, incapable of knowing any universal truth, is the central tenet of British liberalism. It is no accident that the House of Lords report lists British universities as a critical “soft power” resource and puts expansion of Marshall scholarships on the same level of importance as relations with major foreign states. (cont'd)
(cont'd) The “Order” was freshly updated following the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War, by George H.W. Bush and Margaret Thatcher, with France’s François Mitterrand playing a supporting role. The former Soviet Union was looted, devastating both its economy and the life span of its population, with major hauls of loot diverted to British offshore banks. Now, regional genocidal wars and regime change coups were run against any governments not agreeing to the terms of the “New World Order.” Britain, as is its tradition, contributed some troops, but mostly dictated strategy and targets, while allowing use of its world-wide bases for this effort. The American military bore the brunt of battle. The Balkans, the Middle East, and large parts of Africa were set on fire. Millions of people died. American fighters came home both mentally and physically devastated. Thousands of war refugees flooded Europe.
President Trump has called those supporting this Order, “the globalists.” Lyndon LaRouche more precisely locates their disease as the “Anglo-Dutch liberal system” or the New British Empire. Their stink thoroughly permeates major institutions of government in the United States on both sides of the aisle. In the House of Lords Report, they brag about this. They cite their “dense and complex set of relationships across many parts of policy, society, and economic and individual life.” The special relationship, they say, is like an “iceberg” in which most activity takes place out of public view. That “iceberg,” centered in defense and intelligence relationships below the surface, they brag, has so far been able to subvert the declared agenda of the duly elected American President, Donald Trump.
According to the delusional and paranoid “narrative” presented in the House of Lords report, the world-wide economic collapse resulting from their austerity and bailout policies in 2008, absolutely did not cause the revolt of their population in the June 2016 vote to leave the European Union. The collapse simply increased “economic anxieties” among the commoners. The problem, the Lords say, is: "people’s access to information, boosted by instant connectivity on an unprecedented scale and speed. Governments are responding to short-term demands of their citizens, who have been empowered by their access to information and opinion.”
This is the imperial line first promulgated by Samuel Huntington, author of the genocidal tract “Clash of Civilizations” and inventor of the term “Davos man” to celebrate globalization. In his 1975 Crisis of Democracy Report for the Trilateral Commission, Huntington proclaimed that democracies only work when large swaths of the population are apathetic, citing the empowerment of African-Americans by the civil rights movement as a clear and present danger to political stability.
The Lords pontificate that, due to the disturbingly overbroad access to information, many in the “base,” or population, have come to believe in “conspiracy theories” rather than the official accounts of government actions. This meme is widespread now in the trans-Atlantic elites and has been a frequent line used by Barack Obama. Conspiracy theorists, according to them, include those who say the Government’s explanation of 9/11 does not cut it, that the U.S. intervention in Syria and Libya openly supported terrorists, that the Ukraine coup, run by the British and the U.S. State Department, had a major neo-Nazi component, that Russia is not genetically predisposed to evil (both Sir Richard Dearlove and James Clapper have claimed Russians have evil in their genes), and other truths about very real Anglo-American genocides and foreign conspiracies. These offensive truths, which the Lords and Obama label “conspiracy theories,” have been readily accessible until now in the free-for-all of cyberspace, outside the control of major corporate media.
(end of long article)
The 2016 U.S. election and the Brexit vote represented wholesale political activation by the people the elites disdain, Trump’s forgotten men and women, using, ironically, the technology invented for social control purposes by Facebook and Twitter as major organizing tools. These were actual exercises of democracy. The Lords and the antics of their Integrity Initiative make it clear that they intend now to kill this activation. Censorship and counter propaganda or “cognitive infiltration,” as Barack Obama’s friend Cass Sunstein dubbed the required action, are now being massively deployed in the U.S., Britain, and throughout Europe.
Actual experimental studies of the impact of propaganda conducted throughout the years demonstrate that it works when populations have no alternatives to look at, and are reacting constantly to the media bombardment of the 24-hour news cycle. It fails almost immediately when people are introduced to an alternative, such as the publicity surrounding the rapid economic development China is now producing throughout the world, or are presented with the sudden and shocking realization that China is now exploring the far side of the Moon, specifically with the idea of using the Moon’s helium-3 to create fusion power. The wonderful thing about human nature is that the imagination and desire for new frontiers and adventures, if provoked, can and will destroy years of tedious work in planning and implementing any fixed social control system, and that, as if in an instant.
https://www.larouchepac.com/20190110/part-i-british-role-coup-against-president-now-exposed-will-you-act-now-save-nation
PART 2
https://www.larouchepac.com/20190110/part-ii-integrity-initiatives-foreign-agents-influence-invade-united-states
These articles are long so not going to post them.
PART 3
https://www.larouchepac.com/20190112/part-iii-british-intelligence-fraud-creates-coup-against-donald-trump
(an excerpt)
The info war campaign which spread, internationally, the legend that Donald Trump was a Manchurian candidate, involved a small group of individuals in the U.S.—journalists and government officials working or in some way associated with the firm Fusion GPS, British steered networks in the State Department, Obama’s DNI, CIA and FBI chiefs, and the Obama White House. These people had all known each other for years, if not decades, and were skilled in information warfare. In Britain, it involved the intelligence circles of Sir Richard Dearlove, centered in the Henry Jackson Society, Steele’s Orbis Business Intelligence, and the firm Hakluyt, billed as the favored “retirement home” for MI6 spies. The dossier was given credence only because it was backed by very powerful people who insisted that this obvious British hoax must be taken with absolute dead seriousness. Not taking it seriously or speaking out about its obvious flakiness was a career ender in the national security state. These people had one strategic goal in mind: to destroy Trump, the American disrupter, or, at the very least, to undermine his rational desire, expressed throughout his presidential campaign, for better and sane relations with Russia.
(moar)
The Steele Dossier and the Integrity Institute involve the same British intelligence networks revolving around Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6. Dr. Victor Madeira, one of the key staffers at the Integrity Institute used to work directly for Dearlove and Sir Christopher Andrew at the Cambridge Intelligence Forum. In 2014, then DIA chief Michael Flynn was invited to visit that forum and chatted about Russian intelligence history with a Russian graduate student and historian there. Christopher Steele was at the same event. So was Stefan Halper, the close friend of Dearlove who subsequently worked with the CIA and British intelligence in entrapment operations targeting Trump volunteers George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, and Sam Clovis. In 2014, Halper and others claimed that Flynn was compromised by a Russian historian and spread their absolutely false bilge throughout the trans-Atlantic intelligence community in an effort which many believe led to Flynn’s firing by Barack Obama. Flynn’s real sin was his confrontation of the Obama Administration and the British for using terrorists to fight the Assad regime in Syria, highlighting their other alliances with Islamic terrorist groups, and for insisting that Russia could be a valuable ally in the war on terror and on other fronts.
Andrew Wood (the former UK Ambassador to Russia, a friend of Dearlove, and an advisor to Christopher Steele’s Orbis Business Intelligence Company) is listed as a Specialist Team Member of the Integrity Institute. Drew Foxall of the Henry Jackson Society, where Dearlove is the leading light, is listed as a member of the “inner core” of the Institute…
(an excerpt from Part 2)
On November 23, 2018, a group calling itself “Anonymous” posted actual documents from the Integrity Initiative, a rapid-response black-propaganda information-warfare operation targeting Russia, China, Western Europe, and the United States. Since that initial posting, there have been three other document dumps concerning the Initiative, the last on January 4. These documents reveal the “boots on the ground” so to speak, for the cyberspace and black propaganda policies otherwise alluded to in the sanitized diplo-speak of the December 18, 2018 House of Lords report which we covered in Part I of this series.
The Initiative is run under the Institute for Statecraft, a British NGO which receives 95% of its funding from the British government, NATO, and the U.S. State Department. It is housed in London, right next to the International Institute for Strategic Studies in the very rich and chic building which, according to the Grayzone’s Mohamed Elmaazi, once housed the Knights Templar and was the London home of William Astor. This is despite its registration as a charity in Scotland with an address corresponding to a dilapidated and abandoned building. Its funding was recently supplemented by Facebook. It is seeking U.S. tax exemption for a spinoff NGO here, to be funded by the Smith-Richardson Foundation, with the plan to target major cities in the United States outside of Washington, DC or the coasts. In all probability, the plan is to concentrate in the presidential battleground states for the 2020 elections, to prevent a second Trump term. The first document released by Anonymous brags that the Integrity Initiative managed to derail the nomination of Pedro Baños to head Spain’s Homeland Security Department based on a 2-hour smear campaign claiming he was too soft on Moscow.
The Initiative operates on the basis of “clusters” or contact groups of journalists, military and foreign office personnel, academics, and lobbyists within almost every European country, the United States, and Canada, and is now looking to expand to the Middle East. These people get alerts, often through the medium of Initiative “contacts” in British Embassies, to take action when the British Foreign Office perceives a need. A look at the “clusters” for the United States and Britain reveal them to be dominated by individuals from the Atlantic Council, the rabidly anti-Russian and anti-Chinese Jamestown Foundation, the Center for European Policy Analysis, and similar National Endowment for Democracy spinoffs..
Did not see you here to complain about JJP spam-posting 200 posts per bread. I post a huge expose on UK involvement in the US coup and you speak up.
Everything I post, ON THIS Q RESEARCH BREAD, is related to the Q drops. I also support and help other anons who are digging on the Q London drops which included the many Q London pics.
Without your help or support, the anons of the UK Bread have successfully narrowed the timeframe of all the London pics to the Christmas holiday 2013. No one in Q RESEARCH GENERAL has accomplished anything near the level of understanding of those pics as has the UK thread.
Pull your head out of your ass. By dating those pics to Christmas 2013, we can only now, due to the efforts here, ask who was in London during that Christmas holiday in 2013. Anons in General have 27,700 breads and the UK solved the dating of those pics with 40 breads, so fuck off about sliding this thread or wasting bread. You sound like a division shill.
One of those small signs in Gav's vid has a white border which seems a match for one in the same spot of the kiosk. It seems a fair match for ONCE which was playing at the Phoenix from April 2013 to March 2014.
Sorry it's not a seasonal musical.
Precisely. And there is also another "Once" match in the same pic for one of those vertical signs they use on the corners of the kiosk. see pic
p.s. the green spot on the sign is likely a green traffic light reflection.
So we have a MAY 2014 SV image showing posters for a musical that ended MARCH 2014.
I've suspected and commented on this phenomenon before, but not being able to use SV I could have no strong opinion about it. Am just saying anons should take notice in this instance. I would prefer to call those SV dates "publication dates".
CORRECTION: Forget what I said about SV. Double-checked dates "Once" and it ended in March 2015, not 2014. Carry on.