>>13993950
I've told him that I dislike some of the choices he makes in his nouns . . . so you're wrong.
BV has a list of people wh ohave been problem causers here, not that they can't post.
but they only post operational efforts of team-shill agencies (of unknown governance, so I don't know what agencies they are).
and the agencies efforts result in spam floods of various 'efforts' most of which are subliminally subversive and ultimately cringe. they only way to stop it is to shame them out of using those tactics (which only works on some, but those pepole usually come around to understand that comms are comms and benifit everyone, so they tone it down.
but for the truculent teams of agency shills, with their constant repetitive psyop hazing, the only thing that tempers their fowl and maloderous content is to tell them 'warning' and then when they presist, the BV says 'ban'.
but the ban is really a soft thing because the culprits IP hop and instead of posting descrete and useful things, (beause that is part of what should be going on) they go back to the flavored baker discord.
and remember: all flavored breads all taste the same.
they are constant and they were given plenty of warning.
but they kept it up.
and they found out.