You can never go back to OLD TIMES
Old Times were the times of ignorance.
Too many people have learned a lot since then
Here is my suggestion. In the case of Pound, as his name prompts us, follow the money. Mathis here returns to his fakery meme, saying that Pound was probably never confined at all, and we are forgetting that we were not there to check him out. Well, one guy who was there, and did check him out, was a fellow writer by the name of Eustace Mullins, yes that Eustace Mullins: author of The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, a book that was burned in Germany in 1961 (shades of Fahrenheit 451; Joyce also had his books burned). Mullins states that on his visits to Pound at St Elizabeth’s mental hospital, as someone working at the Library of Congress he was commissioned by Pound to research the Fed for the sum of ten dollars a week until the funds ran out. Here are a couple of excerpts from the Foreword.
Quote In 1949, while I was visiting Ezra Pound who was a political prisoner at St.
Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C. (a Federal institution for the insane),
Dr. Pound asked me if I had ever heard of the Federal Reserve System. I
replied that I had not, as of the age of 25. He then showed me a ten dollar bill
marked "Federal Reserve Note" and asked me if I would do some research
at the Library of Congress on the Federal Reserve System which had issued
this bill. Pound was unable to go to the Library himself, as he was being held
without trial as a political prisoner by the United States government. After
he was denied broadcasting time in the U.S., Dr. Pound broadcast from Italy
in an effort to persuade people of the United States not to enter World War
II. Franklin D. Roosevelt had personally ordered Pound's indictment,
spurred by the demands of his three personal assistants, Harry Dexter
White, Lauchlin Currie, and Alger Hiss, all of whom were subsequently
identified as being connected with Communist espionage.
I had no interest in money or banking as a subject, because I was working on
a novel. Pound offered to supplement my income by ten dollars a week for a
few weeks. My initial research revealed evidence of an international banking
group which had secretly planned the writing of the Federal Reserve Act and
Congress' enactment of the plan into law. These findings confirmed what
Pound had long suspected. He said, "You must work on it as a detective
story." I was fortunate in having my research at the Library of Congress
directed by a prominent scholar, George Stimpson, founder of the National
Press Club, who was described by The New York Times of September 28,
1952: "Beloved by Washington newspapermen as 'our walking Library of
Congress', Mr. Stimpson was a highly regarded reference source in the
Capitol. Government officials, Congressmen and reporters went to him for
information on any subject."
I did research four hours each day at the Library of Congress, and went to
St. Elizabeth's Hospital in the afternoon. Pound and I went over the previous
day's notes. I then had dinner with George Stimpson at Scholl's Cafeteria
while he went over my material, and I then went back to my room to type up
the corrected notes. Both Stimpson and Pound made many suggestions in
guiding me in a field in which I had no previous experience. When Pound's
resources ran low, I applied to the Guggenheim Foundation, Huntington
Hartford Foundation, and other foundations to complete my research on the
Federal Reserve. Even though my foundation applications were sponsored by
the three leading poets of America, Ezra Pound, E.E. Cummings, and
Elizabeth Bishop, all of the foundations refused to sponsor this research.
[…]
After my initial shock at discovering that the most influential literary
personality of the twentieth century, Ezra Pound, was imprisoned in "the
Hellhole" in Washington, I immediately wrote for assistance to a Wall Street
financier at whose estate I had frequently been a guest. I reminded him that
as a patron of the arts, he could not afford to allow Pound to remain in such
inhuman captivity. His reply shocked me even more. He wrote back that
"your friend can well stay where he is." It was some years before I was able
to understand that, for this investment banker and his colleagues, Ezra Pound would always be "the enemy". (my emphasis)
https://zulkiflihasan.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/eustace_mullins-secrets_of_the_federal_reserve_bank.pdf
(continued…)
(… continued)
This leads to the following interesting situation, where the red string suddenly stops unravelling and is clearly tied in a knot. There you have in plain terms the contradiction whereby Miles Mathis becomes unstuck: not only could ‘a patron of the arts (…) afford to allow Pound to remain in such inhuman captivity’, it was in his interest to do so as ‘the enemy’. Alternatively, if he means to debunk Mullins as well, then Mathis would have to be himself on the side of the intelligence services he claims to be denouncing.
Returning now to another patron of the arts, John Quinn, we encounter the same contradiction; for if Pound was handled, i.e. funded, by Quinn, then secret service cash was being used to fund Mullins’s disclosure of the Federal Reserve system. This makes little sense, and is in fact in total contradiction with subsequent policy, for in 1967 at least, the CIA did “not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place”
However, since Wikipedia has no love for Eustace Mullins, and since he probably cannot be trusted to speak of Paul Warburg even when quoting Paul Warburg’s own words on the need for secrecy, from his autobiography, I shall look elsewhere for information on the Warburg-Fed issue, no further in fact than the almost official family biography by Ron Chernow, a hefty tome that I myself have studied and analyzed. But for the same reason, I shan’t be quoting myself either, preferring to quote a book review for The Institute for Historical Review by John Weir who begins by saying, “So sympathetic is Chernow's portrayal that it can rightly be regarded as an authorized version of events”.
Quote Along with many other bankers, Chernow explains, Paul Warburg was unhappy with the risk inherent in America's decentralized banking system. The central bank he envisioned for the United States would insure against future "panics" and do away with much of the risk of banking. To this end, he played a key but secretive role in this project:
“In November 1910, [Senator] Aldrich [of Rhode Island], Paul [Warburg], and four other experts sneaked off to discuss bank reform at a secret hideaway on Jekyll Island off the Georgia coast. With Democrats now in control of Congress and Progressives railing against Wall Street, the bankers had to travel incognito, lest they be accused of hatching a cabal.”
As part of the elaborate charade, the conference participants pretended to be sportsmen, outfitting themselves as duck hunters.
What Chernow does not adequately explain is why such secrecy was necessary if a central bank was really such a great idea. We are told, in effect, that Warburg and others hatched a cabal to avoid being accused of hatching a cabal.
Because it was the product of a furtive conclave, and secrecy still surrounds many central bank decision-making activities, it is hardly surprising that there are so many dark suspicions and "banking conspiracy" theories involving the Federal Reserve Bank.[my emphasis]
I would simply conclude by suggesting that this fairly mainstream review is more suspicious of what is going on here than the man intent on exposing as many frauds as possible. Just as the Wikipedia article immediately steers the reader away from Mullins by calling him ‘antisemitic’ and a ‘Holocaust denier’, Miles Mathis steers the reader away from even getting as far as Mullins by denouncing Pound who mentored him. For all I know, in some circumstances, Mullins maybe was ‘antisemitic’ and a ‘Holocaust denier’; but that hardly debunks everything he ever wrote or said. Likewise, when Miles Mathis tells us that Pound was at one time an intelligence asset and a lousy poet, that does not invalidate my statement that at another time Pound was a whistle-blower and a very decent poet. Since I for one can live with more than one side to Pound’s career, in terms of character development as opposed to the cardboard cutout model, I might also speculate how his poetry improved dramatically just as soon as he found his soul and started being his own man…
Animal Comms:
“Pets” are frequently used for long term comms over social media to give updates on controlled individuals.
Dog = Pets. Dog’s are common symbolism used all sorts of ways to communicate. Most commonly they define a relationship with one person (dog) working diligently on behalf of another (Master). Defining characteristics: Leashed, loyal, and they bury things. Dog names, colour, breeds, etc all can further define a comm.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/27/animal-symbolism-comms-dog/
Note how Tom Kitten dies 17 days after Marilyn Monroe
Cat = Pet. Owning a “cat” is such a common practice that it’ll be the specific details like breed and activity that give away the meaning. In general it’s a “Commitment”
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/04/13/celebs-and-pets/
a commitment between the strings and those above for a mission. It’s pretty much the same as dog comms only it can be used in different ways due to the distinctive attributes. It’s used more by Rothschild than Saud.