Anonymous ID: 893395 June 27, 2021, 11:28 a.m. No.13998809   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13998789

Yeah I mean I've been coming in and out over the last year+ because it's hard to justify spending so much time here, especially when the people around you aren't on board, and you have a job.

Not to mention the psychological warfare of knowing that you're up against demons who have no qualms with lying, and who are constantly refreshed every bread.

But that's our cross to bear, and someone has to do it.

Anonymous ID: 893395 June 27, 2021, 11:32 a.m. No.13998847   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8902

>>13998823

I mean they're not hard to spot, but it's hard to fight against a coordinated group when you're atomized. You're constantly fighting a thankless war against a coordinated enemy who hates you and wants you dead, and, fundamentally, until recently there was literally no backup.

Thankfully you and BO/other BVs are here now, but there are just so few humans here it's kinda nuts.

Anonymous ID: 893395 June 27, 2021, 11:45 a.m. No.13998933   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8943 >>8954 >>8979

>>13998902

The most vulnerable attack vector is actually consensus cracking and sliding. This is only possible because there are, currently, more shills/bots here than there are anons.

I've said for a long time that the biggest problem with modern qresearch is the lack of digs. There are no digs anymore. No one seems to care to expose the corruption, because everyone knows it. All the notables now are just MSM articles from "new right" outlets. It's completely anathema to the original notables, which were actual digs into connections between politicians, terrorists, media moguls, bankers, and jews. Now all that's gone, and people just treat this like a chat room.

Granted I'm not doing any better, so I don't really bring it up much, but this place is basically dead, and it's anons faults for letting this be taken from them, like they've let everything be taken from them.

Anonymous ID: 893395 June 27, 2021, 11:57 a.m. No.13999000   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9019 >>9045

>>13998979

Well it used to be that notables required 2 anon nominations, WITH SAUCE, and the baker would verify sauce, and put it in. Then anons would argue about it for the bread or so, and then it would move on.

Shills got wise to the game, and, since they act as a coordinated unit, completely fucked with the process making notables full of shill bullshit, and hiding the stuff they didn't want.

The fact that this has just morphed over time is a consequence of a small, vocal, coordinated, anonymous, paid minority fighting against volunteers who are also anonymous. It's just the nature of anonymity that this is possible, and a fundamentally insoluble problem given the current constraints.

Feel free to propose a solution, I'll back it if I think it's good, but that's just what I see. There is no way to prevent this minority from taking over, no matter what you do, if anons can't/don't/won't agree on the enemy and fight back.

 

>>13998987

I don't get the meaning. What does it mean?