> if it was real it wouldnt
fall flat each time it was reposted and tried again (often)
>that's what Anins do here
a lot of them have also grown red herring & goose chase detectors and can see and smell them coming almost automatically.
it's not a definite rule for sure, but usually when anons scream to look into something with few explanations like >>1400383 and just "shut the fuck up and go look at this" >>1400394 , well, it can have the opposite effect.
play with those all you want but that's no way to get more playmates
>>Anonymous ID: yY946/MZ 148031978 Nov 5 2017 02:03:40 (EST)
>>Is HRC just a puppet and the goal is to take down her minders and the real kingpins?
>Anonymous ID: cS8cMPVQ 148032210 Nov 5 2017 02:06:00 (EST)
>>148031978
>Correction:
<HRC was a puppet but her strings were recently cut.
<She's now on her own and fighting for her life.
>Q
>Every time I post anything about (x), I get shills posting that it's (y). (…) Be careful who you follow.
valid point, be wary of attacks.
all things occult/esoteric/spiritual etc are particulary infested by various muddying waters experts, be just as skeptical as we are when something shiny and new shows up
>((They)) have prepared a digital pasture for us to graze on.
>((They)) have built the fences around us all.
that, just there, is what countless people don't understand about censorship, control, and social engineering.
it's about building the sandbox in which you are "free".
>Doesn't look like your post got any traction.
good stuff, but old, by qresearch standards, the traction's been had already.
but, i do admit there's cycles and repetition.
being there in evenings and seeing the morning shift rediscvoer everything all over again can get quite depressing…
all these meanings, they pile on, like good poetry, they don't cancel each other out.
it's fine