Barcelona Comms - Evidence for Global Seizures Under EO 13848?
>>13988633 (pb)
>>13986722 (pb)
>>13978341 (pb)
tl;dr
Q team may have been monitoring offshore election-interference ops, from at least June 2018. That's a lot of potential seizures under EO 13848.
Anyway, some further Barcelona thoughts (a repeat from a badly toasted bread):
-
Executive Order 13848:
"...the ability of persons located,in whole or in substantial part, outside the United Statesto interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or thecovert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States."
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election
-
Application to Barcelona:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/06/26/report-emails-show-biden-campaign-demanding-facebook-censor-posts-on-election-integrity/
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/23/politics/facebook-dnc-biden-emails/index.html
The original CNN article reads like... getting ahead of the story. In effect:
"Of course Dems and DS operatives used Facebook globally to fortify recent elections. It was nice communication, nothing illegal. See, Facebook even said 'No' sometimes."
But if CNN is publishing innocent emails, what's in the others? Possibly something more "proactive", and likely unlawful under EO 13848. We can easily imagine CNN's "top Biden operatives" - casual totalitarian lingo spit - as euphemisms for CIA and other alphabet agents, all now badly trapped in EO 13848 through Barcelona intercepts.
So apparently Q team et al. were there, monitoring Facebook Barcelona (and FB HQ remotely?) from at least June 2018. Everything recorded in the Barcelona election ops can be used in a court of (martial?) law under EO 13848. All property seized, right up the chains of command and ownership.
Offshoring sensitive election interference ops - not so smart in retrospect?
As in Barcelona, so also in other offshore election-interference ops, worldwide? That seems plausible to anon: Barcelona would be our one public example of a worldwide action under that EO.
That's a lot of people and property, potentially. Anon is not sure his calculator counts that high.
-
re rings:
Rings signify control / power.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/the-cov-op-counter/
Was the black triangle tag a marker of "solidarity" with Q team? McAfee displayed the black triangle ring prominently. Given the extremely precise and very unlikely 23-32 Q lineup between McAfee and FB Barcelona, the black triangle suggests shared control over the monitoring. The street-map 1.7 km (17) from Q tag to Scytl office may also suggest this.
McAfee's wife has now displayed the ring outside his prison. She's placed the ring on a finger that already has another ring upon it, indicating an addition. So the ring does seem to be new, i.e., his - and it's important, flashing prominently before MSM cameras. The visual repetition seems emphatic: a way of making sure we notice.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/25/tech/john-mcafee-wife-janice-intl/index.html