>>14002484

As the saying goes, anons are under attack.

People are nervous because tensions are high everywhere. At this point, it would not surprise me if Jim/Volunteers have disabled trips unilaterally to prevent further Q posts - because what would happen if Q decided to post a call to literal war?

Whether we think something like that is likely, or not, is irrelevant to the fact that we do not know exactly who Q is or what their goal is. We know what they say and we know what we see/hear. Or think we do, at least.

So, likewise, anyone playing at being spoopy is going to be seen as trying to subvert the group.

It doesn't help that there is a near-religion here among some, and doing much more than being a news aggregate or arguing over two pixels of a compressed image is seen as blasphemy.

Then there is also what I warned of a few years ago - the attempt by groups to set up identities. Identities are key to fracturing a community. You get an identity art the front the crowd and habe them do something controversial - splif the oarty.

>>14002971

No, anon, that is not the case.

Only one can speak as Q at a time.

Further, and I can't stress this enough, you do not know who Q is or what their objective is. I can say anything. Bolts of lightning will not come down to assail me if I lie to you and waltz you right into a meat grinder.

You know what Q has said, and can recite it like a religion, but this does not make it any more or less true. Just because you or I believe something does not make it so. Again, from the perspective of businesses, being the platform for a rebellion is a good way to get the king's army to come pay a visit. And only crazies like me welcome the opportunity. People with families and other such things are not going to fight wars or want anything to do with them. Let other mothers' children die is the motto of everyone. The united song of humanity.

>>14002966

One of the first and most critical pieces of disinformation Q utilized was to associate him/herself with the Trump administration.

There are many, many ways to accomplish what Q did. The people responsible for engineering GrayFish, for example, would have complete network penetration of pretty much any government. There is a reason the Russians went to typewriters. They have common sense and can't afford to play grab ass with faggots while the nation burns.

Many in the field believed GrayFish and other products of the Equation Group were from the NSA - but I had my doubts, seeing the quality of government employees. These were likely private side - possibly contractors - and very experienced.

>>14003099

You should try reading comprehension courses or calibrate the respective algo.

>>14003118

Of course, anyone who contests the religion must glow.

Everyone is a fed.

You should probably plug terms that are new to you into a search engine and ask why Kaspersky was not allowed on U.S. government computers. Not because of what was being siphoned off, but because of what it would detect.

No such agency means that it isn't an agency, but would be comparable to the NSA.

There are actors far more powerful than any lowly government out there.