must be you who lacks the cognitive abilities, anon, because I had no issues understanding what was said in that post.
this shill claims others can't speak correctly, even when the communication is in perfect vernacular.
hurry hurry.
seriously you're just doing a 'distraction banter'.
if you have a link, then post it.
seems quiet in here this morning.
So, in the end Barr turned out to the creep that he 'looked like'.
sad to say I knew by his corpulence that he was not to be trusted.
they get these personas from old stage plays.
or situation comedies.
then they 'play them' here.
It's like that episode of friends were Phoebe channels an old woman and she keeps quipping in vernacular from the 1940s, as if she's an old lady.
this one makes a question but the question has no purpose other than if you bothered attending to it you show yourself to be unaware of what you have encountered in your travels through these wild channels.
one does not try to ascertain or comprehend or grasp or hold onto this kind of an interaction.
It's a shill banter that would lead to disparging and hazing.
the statement is merely bait, and purposely vauge. It is also condescending.
next it will devolve into a 'kys' thing, or talk about my sexuality, or gender, or age.
ah, the oh shit repetition shill.
it thinks that repeating the same thing is communicating differntly. It tries to channel a 'Rainman' kind of persona.
I suspect that the count of repetitions could be a code that it uses to comm with other twit-bot shill assistence (because the banter is often scripts run by timers (they call them 'bots', they are timers, or 'cron jobs')
if someone interacts with it , it will summoun (like a door bell) someone who might be like 'shit, I caught a minnow' and end the transactiuon by saying 'filtered' or other such putoff.
remember saying filtered is often just bait to see what the person does next.
if I display what we encounter, how is that a waste?
it's not a waste because some people don't understand these mechanisms. Why else do they still get posted?
whatever , clearly this is a calmer day than the last few mornings have been.
observations are done through measurements. measuring is done with gauges. my posts inspired reply posts. The posts that the bot uses is then gauged and that's how someone like you makes the conclusin you did. Or you're part of the same scripted sequence of responses.
shaken, not stirred.
at which point the shill banter turns into a soliloquey.
another way to guage it : they use terse one liners and have nothing real to say. It's all come ons. They say things to lead you on.
the other thing is they phrase what they explain you as to be something fowl. I didn't 'spend' my time, I 'wasted' it, according to this one.