Anonymous ID: 937c3b June 28, 2021, 7:14 a.m. No.14004926   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4951

>>14004876

I know what it's like to post things that should get engagement from Anons/Bakers but is initially met with crickets.

I spent Sunday being the OG voice calling out GP for being F&G with their Monday! reporting about the AZ audit.

Slowly but surely Anons started to see that I had a good point while none of the Bakers ever Noted it.

I'm just saying that keep plowing forward when you have good diggs and repeat them if you have to.

Eventually enough eyeballs will see there's something there and will start to see "hey that Anon is on to something".

Anonymous ID: 937c3b June 28, 2021, 7:35 a.m. No.14005097   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5108

>>14005004

Thanks for explaining your pov, Baker.

Keeping the comm lines open is often the best solution to resolving issues of Anons feeling slighted.

Much of the JMc digging right now (primarily on /pol/) is conjecture since nobody knows for sure yet.

The best solution for Anons 'dasted in it is to keep posting some of the best stuff they see and go from there.

As a Baker it's your decision as to what you deem is worthy of Noting based upon the level of sauce provided.

Anonymous ID: 937c3b June 28, 2021, 7:41 a.m. No.14005145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5276

>>14005077

You're wasting your time but that's your business.

BO/BV aren't going anywhere.

Since Anons follow Q to wherever he drops, QR will be where Anons hang until if/when Q decides otherwise.

Anonymous ID: 937c3b June 28, 2021, 7:49 a.m. No.14005225   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5252

>>14005171

>according to a new Axios excerpt from Wall Street Journal reporter Michael Bender's book

So, the Axios sauce is whatever Mikey on a Bender's sauce is.

Lot of onion layers to peel back on that one.