>>14007002 (pb)
How to Check Timestamps for 'Statistically Impossible' Digits?
re: "17 Timestamp from Joe", and related timestamp curiosities:
Is it possible to check public figures' tweets and other posts for Q timestamp 'handler' anomalies which would be statistically significant?
Maybe…
-
Set plausibly simple combinatorial rules for a sum, such as '17',
-
Use the rules to find what the probability of a random timestamp giving that '17' sum might be.
-
Run for example Biden's tweets thru the rules checker, to see if the '17' frequency is, ah, "statistically impossible", as they say.
-
What might be good rules? Maybe include:
-
Simple digit sum.
-
Hours and minutes sum.
-
+12 PM hours and minutes sum.
Other?