> He discredited R by telling us Jr. was dead.
anon's referring to REPUBLICANS. learn to discern from context.
>as a future billionaire this sounds awful
if you have a billion dollars and the taxman takes 99%, you STILL have $10 MILLION!! exactly what do you have to cry about?
being on this board, i bet you CALL yourself a Christian. reread the parable of the rich man and the poor widow tithing at the temple.
it's NOT how much the gov't takes in absolute dollars, it's NOT what percent the gov't takes. the ONLY thing that counts in God's eyes is HOW MUCH YOU KEEP FOR YOURSELF.
go 'head…. be a pig.
>lets keep pushing out the eviction moratorium too.
just as soon as blackrock and vanguard own everything, wait bet the eviction moratorium ends in a NY second?
>you see
>you are not persuading anons
>fag
>we have seen too much
who the FUCK elected YOU to speak for all anons? neck yourself, shitbreath tranny whore.
ANONS will decide who and what to consider, and right now, the one you call divisionfag presents a case as compelling as the Qtard version. i, for one, will hold off on any decision, until actual solid evidence is forthcoming. so far, the only circumstantial evidence of a few low-hanging fruit being pruned. hardly qualifies as proof to a plan to drain the swamp and return power to the people. yet i will allow that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. that is why i wait and watch and pray.
and just remember THIS… 50 yrs ago, we the people had a LOT more power than we do now… they were called labor unions. that is until that good conservative ronnie raygun destroyed them.
>There are some commies in politics, but America is capitalist.
capitalism IS communism, just wearing a different pair of pajamas. in the end, one tiny group has a monopoly on everything, JUST LIKE COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM. try using your head for something besides an assplug.
>Socialism / Communism is NOT the answer.
show me where i said it was. i DARE you.
WELL…. i'm STILL WAITING….
taxing the OBSCENELY wealthy is NOT socialism. regulating the uncontrolled growth of corporate power is NOT communism. you're either a shill or a retard. fuck off.
>You’re wrong…
>Capitalism = free trade
you're a fucking brainwashed moron. capitalism means whoever is lucky enough to have the most money to start, and plays the dirtiest, ends up owning everything, by crushing competition, stifling innovation and progress, by whatever means necessary. capitalism is KRYPTONITE to free trade.
that's right, when you cannot refute the truth, resort to obtuse inane parables. well, at least you're one rung higher on the evolutionary ladder than those that resort to name calling.
btw, since you're so big on fables with morals, reread the parable of the wheats and tares.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE……….
lmfao. what 'tard claims authority by listing their "credentials" and "accomplishments" on an anonymous msg board?
>Holy shit. You are one of the dumbest fucks to post on this board. Congratulations. You should get a prize.
>"Capitalism," better known today as Judeo-Capitalism, is an economic system. (((Communism))) is an (((IDEOLOGY.)))
so howcum in the end they both produce the same result? a tiny fraction of people end up with ALL the wealth, power, and control?
you can paint them up with words to sound like night and day, but ultimately, YE SHALL BE KNOWN BY YOUR FRUITS.
speaking of fruits……
>Seriously. READ A FUCKING BOOK, NIGGER.
seriously, GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR OWN ASS AND TAKE A LOOK AROUND, capitalist PIG.
>Capitalism is free trade,
you are too fucking stupid to waste time with. how can there be free trade when one corporation is able to buy up all their competition and crush it, just because they have MORE CAPITAL? that's NOT "free trade," FUCKWIT. there can BE NO free trade without free and unfettered competition with companies on equal footing. that is NOT what capitalism is about. i'm NOT advocating socialism, so fuck you for trying to put word into my mouth. i'm ALL FOR free trade and free enterprise. YOU are the one who is too brainwashed and too triggered by words to understand what "capitalism" actually means.
ahhhh…. insults….. the last resort of the intellectually challenged trying to defend a fatally flawed argument. how can i compete with that?
when you can't refute the facts, sidestep the question with jargon, group-think, propaganda slogans, and jingoism.
do you REALLY think your post contains any information this anon is not already aware of?
nor does it have any bearing on the point we were debating.
look here… don't look there (where i put my foot in my mouth).
>Your support for the welfare state has become painfully clear to everyone here.
i VEHEMENTLY oppose a welfare state, especially CORPORATE welfare. if you "gleaned" the opposite from my posts, you're a RETARD, and not worth anyone's time.
arguments are reserved for those competent to understand, assimilate, and respond in an intelligent manner. sorry you don't qualify.
but let me pose just a few questions to you. i will stick to concrete facts and demonstrable technology. do you know what the efficiency of the internal combustion engine in your car is? that's ok, i didn't expect that you would. it's less than 1%. yes, that's correct, 99.3% of the energy contained in the shit that passes for gasoline these days escapes your car's tailpipe as waste heat. but your ignorance of these basic facts is probably why when someone tells you that your car COULD be getting upwards of 200 miles per gallon of gasoline, you dismiss it as tinfoil hat lunacy. but 200 mpg would require only the most modest improvement from 0.7% thermodynamic efficiency to a mere 7% efficiency. sound eminently doable? well it is, and the tech has been around since at least 1952 when one version was patented. so why, you might ask, are car companies not falling over one another to produce such a car? GEE…. could it have anything to do with the FACT that standard oil and british petroleum together own controlling interests in EVERY car manufacturor? and better mileage cars mean LESS petroleum sales, and oil profits vastly outweigh auto mfgring profits. do you begin to comprehend how allowing WESAYSO corporation to have a monopoly on ALL manufacturing is BAD for everyone else? do you BEGIN to grasp that unrestricted capitalism (money talks and shit walks) is NOT the pie-in-the-sky economic miracle you have been brainwashed to believe it is?
that's ONE tiny example. i don't have the time or inclination to type out a million more, because if one doesn't get thru your thick skull, even an infinite number would likely fail, as well.
now…. go shove your insults up your ass. they might run into your brain there, and jar it into THINKING, instead of mindlessly repeating corporate/capitalist propaganda slogans.
>Your solution is to tax the criminals…
>This suggests that you don’t mind all the corruption, you just want your cut.
wow…. hard to believe that anyone draw a conclusion that retarded. first and foremost, if the obscenely wealthy are taxed out of existence, they won't have the money (power) to buy and corrupt gov'ts. that's just for starters. even with a true free market economy and honest gov't, there's still a need for taxes to support infrastructure, defense, etc. isn't it morally and ethically preferable that those who have benefited the most from the system carry the bulk of the cost of maintaining the system?
>you do not know how this game works, huh.
i know which side wins, not that it matters, because even if your side did win, the fate of all their "useful idiots" will be the same.
enjoy the taste of betrayal. you reap what you sow.
that is a crude schematic, but yes, the basic problem is converting droplets of liquid fuel into the gaseous state, because combustion can ONLY OCCUR in the gas phase. there are other entirely different approaches to capturing the "waste" heat and extracting useful work from it. turbocharging, secondary combustion chambers (in place of the catalytic converter which converts unburned fuel to waste heat), or simply starting with gaseous hydrocarbons instead of liquid ones. if one-tenth of the engineering effort that goes into designing a new body style every year were put into optimizing combustion, cars would get 200+ mpg and gasoline would be 50¢/gal. but some 'tards here would have to give up their wetdreams about capitalism before that could happen.
and the REASON we are not all driving one is CAPITALISM. because banks heavily invested in obsolete technology (capitalism) will NEVER fund the development of better technologies. and if push comes to shove, capitalists with unlimited wealth can MURDER anyone who dares to invent a better technology and bring it to market without banker money.
>the Keynesian liberal model of economics a.k.a. capitalism
besides the basic kindergarden lesson that everyone benefits more from co-operation than a kill-or-be-killed law of the jungle…
your precious keynesian model of economics was MATHMATICALLY PROVEN to be flawed by john nash. you know… the guy that won one of those… whatchamacallums… nobel prizes in economics.
just like the flawed and obviously absurd notion of the "prisoner's dilemma," which has been erroneously applied to game theory for decades. it ONLY applies in cases where you will never encounter the other party again, or in cases where one party dies. that RARELY happens in real life. you think you're so smart, but all you do is mindlessly repeat the dogma that fits your warped preconceptions of human nature. YOU are wrong about humans, and i pity those that are unfortunate enough to cross your path.
in essence, but of course more engineering would be required to optimize such a system for a car's ICE. there are recurring reports of individual garage tinkerers who have done exactly that with remarkable results. they all seem to meet an untimely end. just coincidence, i guess….
maybe notable to you, but ancient history to those that have spent a lifetime researching suppressed technologies…
i have no interest in being "silkwooded" by the oil cartels, thx. doing it myself for my private use is not economically practical, nor does it fit into my schedule IRL.
that's your argument? the peace prize has always been a political joke. not so much the prizes for actual hard sciences, like chem, phys, and MATH (economic theory).
just because i didn't waste bread typing out all the details doesn't mean no one has worked out a better system. it's called free enterprise with RESTRICTED capitalism. it's called ENFORCING the Sherman Anti-Trust Laws which teddy roosevelt championed a century ago. i'm NOT a communist and FUCK YOU for saying i am. clearly your thoroughly washed brain is incapable of separating unrelated concepts, and you only see in black and white, and paint anyone who differs one iota from YOUR dogma as a commie. you are a pathetic excuse for human, and the main problem with our species is people like (You). i'm embarrassed to be in the same genera as a knuckle-dragger like you.
there it is… name calling. the last resort of the terminally stupid defending a demonstrably absurd premise.
thank you for proving who and what you really are.
learn to read, 'tard.