One way to heal and many ways to fall apart and be destroyed. If the end result is destruction is it of benefit to describe in great detail that destructive process. I find it hysterical when folks leave a docs relieved because at least they "know" what's wrong.
Did you know blood is at most a third of the fluid in an animal body? So if a medical diagnosis was derived by examining blood counts and figures and more information derived from blood, how does that impact the accuracy of a diagnosis?
And what about the other… health; how did this become so illusive? I would start pronouncing it heelth to emphasize that healing is implied in health.
And if it was possible, a method for generating health (a state wherein no illness can exist) opposed to "curing" FILL IN THE BLANK, would you take the opportunity… or more appropriately privilege?
What if there was a plan (a very old plan)? One based on chemistry and physics that would generate health. Would it be of interest? Still reading.