so some faggot accused one of jims friends who is a journalist of doxxing him?
tell me why anons should care again. spare me your usual bullshit if you're capable. and actually tell me what the hell this is about so i can understand it.
>#Babyfister is doxxing and putting shit in archive files.
so is that statement just gonna get spammed as fact while faggots demand it be notable or global? or can anybody bother to offer some context.
i knew i wouldnt get anything. and i know exactly where this is going kek.
perfect logic. divisive shill narratives are built over time. you can only give so much before it falls apart. if you stretch it out you can exploit it moar effectively.
all you have to do to prove us wrong is tell us what this is about so we can also be informed enough to have an opinion. instead you CHOOSE to be a patronizing gatekeeper so you can shove your narrative down anons throats. this one is DOA.
>I dont care
we can agree on that. you will revel at the opportunity to feed me yous all night long to make up reasons not to explain it. and wont lift a finger to serve anything or anybody other than yourself.
>but just trust me