>>1400619
can photofags x-ray this and see if it is shopped? If not, yuge!
>>1400619
The spelling errors stood out to me to, but I was
more concerned with validating the text and the
date because that's over a year ago and an anon
was posting something that directly aligns
with what we are seeing today and sort of mirrors
what Q has recently dropped.
Didn't even have to photofag… missed the easy way
to validate. Well done anon. This is significant.