>>14037253
quite contrary.
It's a function of disruption. Sometimes anons get caught up in it, b/c everyone's knee jerk reaction is to pin blame on "others" → Jews have always been a good target for that.
So, the question is begged, what are the progenitors of the hate trying to achieve and why?
Q said the goal was to unite the core, logic dictates that it wouldn't be in derision or hate towards a group, but rather a fight for freedom.
So, this assault disrupts, why? what's the point?
Logic again dictates that the person/players seeking to do so (disrupt our movement) seek to do so because s/he / they gain something by our lack of unity.
The more anons and bakers in particular that jump on the hate wagon, the more they unwittingly do a disservice to the Great Awakening than they realize. Doing so it provides a toe hold for the echo chamber to point out the "white supremacy" "racist" factions to ultimately discredit the rest of us (overwhelming majority).
(apologies – got interrupted, might not flow so well, but I think you'll get the idea).