>Not Gerbil.
Not gerbil.
>You're such a hypocrite. You were selling the idea of disenfranchising thousands with block bans before you were fired.
>Keep being a hypocrite, it's you.
Be a lot easier to just call it what it is… a tranny jew.
So funny how you B faggots love Q posts when they benefit the narrative you want pushed.
>SOMEONE IS PAYING ATTENTION
>So funny how you B faggots love Q posts when they benefit the narrative you want pushed.
You retards are here 24/7 working in shifts.
>Um, no. Not either of those, either. Just an anon, like you, but without the flashy BV thingy.
>
>/facepalm
Posts picture of Doctor Strange - Check
Says Nik'd - Check
Says Guud - Check
Likes posting redheads - Check
Yea, you're totally not Doc, what was I even thinking.
How many have they created now?
Comms
MNR
ABCU8
Warroom
TruthLegion
QRB
I know there are more, what am I missing?
>anyone can post a pic oss
>doesn't mean it's me
Anyone can dual-dox and say it isn't me Doc, doesn't mean it isn't you. Also, I didn't boot you from the kitchen or your clone, I just pointed out who the likely candidate is. Stop while you are ahead.
> Seems the reason for the down-tick in board activity is becoming clear as bakers step up to the task, and summarily get lumped in with antagonists of anons' town hall of Qresearch.
Just fucking collect notables and stfu.
>>14037199
>a fucking clue
Morning Babyfist. How many sock puppets you running this morning?
>Perhaps that ain't happening and only Q can decide at this point.
Q already decided, why do you think I am a BV and comms is relegated to IP hopping and posting dick sucking memes. If Q wanted them in charge we'd all be posting on /MNR/ instead of listening to them cry here and say "It wasn't me" over here.
>inb4 the 5 comms faggots in this bread try to tell you not to believe what you see and deltas mean nothing.
You never had power, the moment I called you on your shit anons dumped you. Also, don't speak in the third person. That's GerBil level gay.
>If your thoughts are so valuable, why not post them anonymously, like the rest us?
>(rhetorical question, please don't reply)
Because when I do you cry that I am a BV and should let everyone know I am BV, as always you are duplicitous cunts.
>And until/if that happens anyone trying to make QR a miserable place in order to get Anons to leave is 100% shill and not a true follower of Q.
Nailed it.
> What WAS the original form? Were there restricted notables or open to anon choice?
Only Q related topics
Articles had to be archived
2 anon notable nominations
Links had to be broken
no direct links to our enemies to starve them of advertisement money.
>>14037430
>you've made half of the board leave
Gaslight more
Instead of posting a link to a CNN article, you would archive the article and post the archive. This ensured we always had an archive in case said article was deleted/altered, and starved our enemies of ad revenue. Bakers allowing lazy anons to stop doing this was the beginning of the downfall of Q research original culture.
>>14037494
>UID count is way down and almost every baker has quit, that's why there are always ebakes
#1. That ain't me nigger
#2. Q directly put you on blast with all the color revolution post a week after you refused to notable the shit for days on end while anons tried to fight you fags.
#3. The fact that /MNR/ exists is a huge monument to the victory anons had over you fags. If you had won, there would be no /MNR/ and we'd be being directed by CommsKaren, the cunt you bow down to.