Anonymous ID: 558edd July 2, 2021, 11:45 a.m. No.14038182   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8210 >>8258

>>14038155

For reference.

Anon will read diligently and digest.

11.23 OTHER ECONOMIC REGULATION OF OCCUPIED TERRITORY

 

11.23.1 The Occupying Power has the right to regulate commercial intercourse within, into, or out of the occupied territory. It may subject such intercourse to such prohibitions or restrictions as are essential to the purposes of the occupation.468 The Occupying Power also may remove existing commercial restrictions or regulations when essential to the purposes of the occupation.469 For example, the Occupying Power may suspend existing customs tariffs.470 The purposes of the occupation that justify economic regulation may include the military interest of the Occupying Power, the needs of the inhabitants of occupied territory, and applicable law of war obligations. For example, for its military purposes, the Occupying Power may impose a moratorium on business payments until an effective occupation government is in place in order to safeguard financial institutions, to preserve records, and to ensure that funds and other assets of the enemy government are not transferred without the knowledge and approval of the Occupying Power. Similarly, for purposes of security and restoration of public order, the Occupying Power may also take steps to prevent hoarding of supplies, to curb or prevent black markets, and to regulate labor conditions, including strikes.471 As another case in point, in order to fulfill its obligations with respect to the preservation of cultural property in occupied territory, the Occupying Power may issue commercial regulations intended to prevent illegal traffic in, and looting of, such property.472 Additional authority to regulate the economy of occupied territory may be provided by U.N. Security Council resolutions.47

Anonymous ID: 558edd July 2, 2021, 11:58 a.m. No.14038258   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14038182

> enemy government

Within the context of this clause, anon presumes that the occupying power is the illegitimate Bidan regime.

Does that, therefore, make the rightfully, but disenfranchised elected incumbent the enemy government?