>>14037041 (pb)

Agreed. Been saying this since Feb.

IMO 2/3rds of the shit that gets notabled is not notable. We need to be a lot more selective.

Should be run as a tight ship…

At the very least group notables in some sort of fashion.

We have let [THEM] control the notables for too long and the longer the list of notables the more subversive action goes unrecognized by the masses of anons.

Anons are analysts. Feeding us 2/3rds bullshit obviously makes a large impact on our final 'product'.

I agree with the: 1) Proofs 2) Digs (true in the sense that the SOURCE is valid, not that the conclusion is accurate), possibly a third 'Interdasting' category… Things like 'anon opines', unsourced but relevant events, etc. Nearly all of our notables would fall into the third category, which is sub-optimal.

This not only makes it much easier on casual anons who aren't here all day and would miss something because they're not going to backtrack through all of the days breads BUT… It also makes it much easier for us to 'weaponize' the truth, the more focused the beam, the brighter the LIGHT. (laser-focus)

I'd also suggest instead of having separate breads for all kinds of topics that will eventually be pushed out of the catalog by all of the new breads, daily. Things like Advanced Tech/Anti-Gravity breads come to mind as they were some of my favorite and I'm not sure other people would search them out, but the information is, IMO, relevant.

Not sure how to actually get this plan into action without causing more chaos and uncertainty, but it needs to be done.

Also, the more we ban the shills on VPNs, the more you restrict access to anons connecting via the same VPNs. I know that's obvious but if one does not have a good # of IPs available to them, you risk losing anons that dont know about or want to IP hop.

God Bless us ALL.

>>14039442

They don't like it when people have ideas that could loosen their grip. FORBIDDEN. INSULTS. ACCUSATIONS. ANGER.

I think it's pretty obvious who is shilling and who is here to help, lol.

They can't even blend in when they're trying.

>>14039415

I've made precisely 4 total posts from Feb until now about the notables…

It's not about 'digesting' the information, ANYBODY can fucking read what is put in front of them.

It's a matter of reducing the impact of subversive bakers and keeping things MUCH more organized for EVERYONE.

It is NOT too much to ask to stop making EVERYTHING notable (so many of the notables go straight from comment, zero replies straight to the top of notables) and to organize better.

If that's too much to ask, then this place is absolutely fucked and has been fucked forever now and it's fucked precisely because of lack of adaptation. The shills use the same dumbass tactics over and over and we refuse to adapt? Which one of us is the dumbass, then?

Would you like to debate any of the points in my original post, or is your entire argument that anybody can read the notables so it makes no difference, you like it the hard(inefficient) way with no hand holding?

If you don't need a babysitter, then what's the Baker for? Do you just ignore notables and compile your own? Someone is holding your hand and that person is FREQUENTLY a SHILL.

The entire reason I made the post is BECAUSE the board is fucky. Every baker does RANDOM shit, notables are comped EVERY SINGLE DAY, shills everywhere, yet you wish to remain stagnant?

The shillery isn't going to and never has stopped me from doing my work here, but it's ridiculous to be so anti-change as you watch the board descend into chaos.

This is precisely why the board is dying and you wish to go down with it.

What do you have against tidying the ship and making our work here more efficient and resilient to tampering?

Do you truly expect casual anons that spend less than an hour a day here to really be able to go through the days notables and compare them to see if a shill was baking that shift? It's so fucking insane. There is a reason this place is dying… OPEN YOUR EYES. DO SOMETHING TO COUNTER THEIR OBVIOUS PLAYBOOK. SITTING ON YOUR ASS AND TROLLING THOSE THAT ARE PUTTING IDEAS OUT THERE IS NOT HELPING YOU, OR THIS PLACE.

Why do you wish to avoid honest debate and discourse about better ways to run the ship? Provide counter arguments and good-faith debate… The 'shut up faggot, that's what shills say, you must be getting off on the board being terrible' argument is exactly what I'd expect from le divisive shill, not an anon.

>>14039508

Completely agree. I will be the first to admit I definitely don't have THE answer. I don't care in the slightest if any of my ideas are implemented or not, but I sense that the discussion NEEDS to be had, or as you said, it will remain a point of contention.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on ways to improve the kitchen. Not sure why so many are against adapting the kitchen a bit to reduce the impact of subversive bakers. We know what the shills do and how they do it, but nobody seems to want a coherent, good-faith debate on how we can combat it. Just infighting/sliding while the shills get what they want.

As always, just my opinion.