I like the bread title but I think the truth about the bioweapon needs some clarification or is more nuanced than presented.

I've seen the Pirbright patent info before, but what I think is more telling and significant is the information surrounding the "spike protein" of the CCP virus.

The spike protein is what fosters the entry of "the virus" into cells AND it also seems to be the major toxic payload of the virus. This protein was engineered, it seems, so that a virus that would normally infect bats is highly effective in infecting humans via the ACE2 receptor. You don't get species "jumps" of a virus of this nature -one moment happing killing bats and then totally adapted to be highly infective in humans.

This video is really informative on the subject.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-definition-of-a-bio-weapon/

It has been a couple of years since I realized that an actual "in the wild" virus isn't that great of a bioweapon. It might harm folks you don't want to harm or else not infect people you do want to harm. However, a vaccine is VERY targeted and can even be manipulated by batch, etc. For example pharmaceutical companies have been know to mix batches or possibly even direct "bad" batches to certain places.

Now where the fun comes in is if you consider that the major payload of the virus is the spike protein. That being the case, what happens when a person's own body is "hijacked" by an mRNA or vector vaccine to make a massive amount of "spike proteins"? You get all the destruction of the original "virus" while getting to lie to people that their antibodies will protect them. Why do "cases" spike after vaccine pogroms are launched?

I have some questions: 1. Why do US government entities have "patents" on "stabilized spike proteins"? 2. Why do Pfizer and Moderna get to make MASSIVE profits if the actual business end of the vaccine bioweapon is actually a either a Chinese or US government (maybe both) creation?

https://www.axios.com/moderna-nih-coronavirus-vaccine-ownership-agreements-22051c42-2dee-4b19-938d-099afd71f6a0.html

'What they're saying: NIH said in a statement that its scientists created the "stabilized coronavirus spike proteins for the development of vaccines against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2," and the government consequently has "sought patents to preserve the government's rights to these inventions."'

>>14041720

Did you see her interview with Tucker?

Anyone who would give that vaccine to a child is out of their mind.

>>14041816

Yes, getting the virus to infect human cells IS gain of function. That "spike protein" is very, very dangerous, because THAT is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor and it is by itself, harmful.

Making human cells manufacture the spike is a bioweapon assault.

>>14041853

Sure. The "virus" is almost but not quite an non-sequitur. The issue is injecting ANYTHING that makes your body produce the real weapon: The "spike protein".

As for the "virus". I think the loss of taste and smell plus a couple of other symptoms indicate something is interacting with the CNS. The goal could be several forms of disability including neurological damage. However, once you take any vaccine that results in spike protein production you can have damage. I think "the virus" could be insidious because it may inhabit bacteria and/or other microorganisms which may be intracellular parasites, which partially explains the effectiveness of ivermectin and HCQ against "the virus".

I don't want either the "virus" or the "vaccine". However, I think the vaccines are vastly more dangerous.

>>14041877

I think so. We don't really know what is in the injections. Are the mRNA jabs self-amplifying? This would mean, I think, that the jab causes cells not only to make spike proteins (many copies from each bit of mRNA) but perhaps to make more mRNA and to perhaps encapsulate to infect other cells or other people.

Under certain circumstances RNA can be reverse transcribed to DNA and potentially incorporate into cells. I would be concerned about germ line changes.

>>14041899

Yes, absolutely! And this includes demon-possessed (trying to be somewhat kind, not that they deserve it) Teacher's Unions, who want to indoctrinate, groom and destroy the nation's children. The Teacher's Unions are getting ready to demand vaccination of the nation's children.

>>14041926

I am trying to understand this myself. My biochemistry and genetics were a very long time ago, but I loved genetics in particular. The current science has left me in the dust in many respects as I never worked in my field (biology) but the vaccine issue is the driving interest of my current studies which started in earnest in 2016 when "Vaxxed" came out.

Along the way I did a personal dig on the NIH concluding that it has always harbored eugenicists. The eugenics influence is not well hidden. They want to cull and control us in order, I think, to attain the power and riches many of them seem to want.

I don't plan to take another injection of any kind, though I suspect MAYBE a few vaccines have limited benefits for a few folks. They should never be a "public health" tool, however. This will inevitably attract the power mad and evil people who see it as a way to control the population en masse.

>>14041996

Yes, I totally agree.

I'd like to try and figure it out actually.

>>14041996

The chips are a choke point for the industry right now. But, I think a lot of people might not want the chips anyway. Would fuel mileage go down? Maybe so, but if you could repair/work on it at home and if you could make your own ethanol (allowed on farms up to a certain amount) it could be great, I think.

>>14041720

Something VERY interesting was said during the interview the mom had with Tucker. I think the mom said her daughter had an MRI and then her condition deteriorated again. Isn't one hypothesis about why magnetizing techniques may have been used in the vaccine is because magnetism might serve to drive the mRNA into cells? SPIONS is the term.

If magnetism would further the damage, should vaccinated people get MRIs?

>>14042035

I really think there was something insidious going on with the tests. A contaminated swab would put dangerous substances or microorganisms very close to the CNS. At least one person I read of had a serious injury from the testing. Perhaps they were relying on the dim-wit nurses to push bacteria/pathogens far enough into the nasal cavity to initiate harm.

>>14042062

Didn't a planefag note a flight out of Spain that might have been related to the "death" of JM?

I was ruminating on this subject today. Is JM's "passing" forcing a release of info somehow? If the release is now inevitable, wouldn't it behoove people who want to save their asses to start voluntarily dropping information. For example the Ghislaine Maxwell/Clinton documents?

Here's the thing. The obvious cases of myocarditis are likely just the tip of the iceberg of vaccine induced heart damage. There is no such thing as "mild" myocarditis, btw.

Any person, males especially, should probably be aware that if they took the vaccine they are at risk of heart damage. I'd guess there is a possibility with any jab that makes the human body produce "spike proteins" but in the US the major vaxxes are Moderna and Pfizer. These are bio-weapons and anyone suggesting you get one is not your friend.

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1411131155605299200

The high troponin levels suggest really BAD heart damage, I think. As in people could end up needing heart transplants.